ORC minutes 010417 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 2.1.17 12 and follow without worrying about what sector X does, sector Y does. And that’s a pretty constant theme I’m hearing from you 581 all right now. 582 583 Lydia Wegman: I need an example to understand what you’re talking about. 584 585 Michael Harvey: Instead of saying metal or mining section, just have metal or mining see list below and then list them all out, 586 instead of relying on sectors. 587 588 Lydia Wegman: I see. 589 590 Lisa Stuckey: If they’re not all allowed? 591 592 Michael Harvey: Right. If we want to allow stone mining and quarrying just allow stone mining and quarrying without having to 593 break it down into its added finite. The next comment I’ll make goes to an earlier comment Paul made, go to page 49. The 594 bottom of 48 and all of 49, this is government uses and public administration. That’s a category under the NAICS code. We’re 595 getting into executive, legislative, and other general governmental support, executive offices, legislative bodies, and public 596 finance. 597 598 Lisa Stuckey: Michael, if you and the other Michael Harvey’s in the state are all doing this is this not a ridiculous and huge 599 reproduction of effort? 600 601 Michael Harvey: Well that’s the problem because the other Michael Harvey’s in the state aren’t necessarily doing it this way 602 because the other Michael Harvey’s of the state don’t answer to the County Attorneys for Orange County. Orange County’s 603 legal advice is to say you need to fix our table permitted uses to make sure we don’t find ourselves in a predicament where 604 we’re going to get sued and lose because of Byrd v. Franklin. 605 606 Lydia Wegman: But it was a State Supreme Court decision, so it applies statewide but each County is responding in its own 607 fashion. 608 609 Craig Benedict: Everybody has a different opinion of what uses they would want in their area and what would be prohibited. 610 When I worked in Florida I used a rendition of the previous NAICS called the standard industrial code classification. I used 611 major categories in there, I didn’t list it but it was just better, it was organized to talk about manufacturing and assembling and 612 distribution and warehousing. It seemed to have some organization and we listed as many prohibited uses as we could think 613 of, but things changed over time. 614 615 Tony Blake: I think the minute you include the NAICS numbers you’re opening yourself to anything you leave out. 616 617 Michael Harvey: Yeah, and I think some of the direction I’ve received is to take the NAICS numbers out. They’re here to give 618 you a reference point right now. 619 620 Craig Benedict: We may use our own numbering. 621 622 Tony Blake: Well your own numbering would be useful if it was in a separate column and it could be from a data perspective. If 623 it’s an individual index it could make data indexing faster, it could make organization faster when it’s electronic. 624 625 Lydia Wegman: Just going back to the governmental uses, there doesn’t seem to be much benefit to the NAICS code in that 626 instance. 627 628 Paul Guthrie: What is your deadline to get this done? 629 630 Michael Harvey: Well you all are going to be reviewing it in June or July for recommendation with a public hearing in 631 September. 632 633