Browse
Search
ORC minutes 070115
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Ordinance Review Committee
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
ORC minutes 070115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 11:50:15 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 8/5/15 <br />2 <br /> 51 <br />Lisa Stuckey: What about the HOA in a subdivision that wants to put a ball field on an open space? 52 <br /> 53 <br />Michael Harvey: Perfectly legal because it is technically approved as part of the subdivision process. 54 <br /> 55 <br />Tony Blake: What if they want to do it retroactively? 56 <br /> 57 <br />Michael Harvey: The same thing as long as they comply with the ordinance with respect to compliance of Article 7 58 <br />which is subdivision standards. Again, County parks would not be affected by this. 59 <br /> 60 <br />Lydia Wegman: Regarding Section 5.7.2, shooting ranges, no outdoor range shall be closer than 30 feet to the 61 <br />property range? 62 <br /> 63 <br />Michael Harvey: That is reference to commercial shooting ranges, like an archery range. In these instances 64 <br />shooting would only be allowed indoors. Private, residential shooting areas, the required setback is 300 feet. 65 <br /> 66 <br />AGENDA ITEM 2: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENTS 67 <br /> PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS REVISIONS 68 <br />To review and comment upon proposed amendments to the DUO to revise the public 69 <br />hearing process. 70 <br /> 71 <br />Presenter: Perdita Holtz, Planning Systems Coordinator 72 <br /> 73 <br />Perdita Holtz: Reviewed abstract and began presentation. 74 <br /> 75 <br />Tony Blake: This is where I was confused. I see the notes regarding the public meeting on page 43, but where is the 76 <br />neighborhood information meeting described? 77 <br /> 78 <br />Perdita Holtz: It is in the neighborhood information meeting section, Section 2.9. 79 <br /> 80 <br />Tony Blake: Are any changes being made to that? 81 <br /> 82 <br />Perdita Holtz: No 83 <br /> 84 <br />Tony Blake: I was going to suggest that the Planning Board member representing that township should be invited into 85 <br />the neighborhood information meeting and that’s an important change. 86 <br /> 87 <br />Perdita Holtz: If it’s a matter of inviting someone, that can be done administratively and not have to be written into the 88 <br />UDO. If it’s something that you want to require then that’s something that can be written into the UDO or into the 89 <br />Planning Board Rules of Procedure. 90 <br /> 91 <br />Lisa Stuckey: That wouldn’t be appropriate in a quasi-judicial situation? 92 <br /> 93 <br />Perdita Holtz: The Neighborhood Information meeting isn’t a quasi-judicial meeting, but to explain how the process 94 <br />works to neighbors. 95 <br /> 96 <br />Lisa Stuckey: I would touch base with a lawyer because it seems unlikely that you wouldn’t get information n ot 97 <br />available to BOCC and other Planning Board members upon which you would base your votes. 98 <br /> 99 <br />Tony Blake: The only thing you would get is information would be the neighbor’s comments. 100 <br /> 101 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: In the quasi-judicial world, if those neighbors are not experts, you can’t take it into consideration. 102
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.