Orange County NC Website
Article 2: Procedures <br /> Section 2.7: Special Use Permits <br /> <br /> <br />Orange County, North Carolina – Unified Development Ordinance Page 2-23 <br /> <br />(2) The Planning Director shall post on the affected property a notice of the <br />public hearing at least ten days but not more than 25 days prior to the <br />date of said hearing. <br />(3) Notice of the public hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general <br />circulation in Orange County once a week for two successive weeks, <br />with the first notice to be published not less than ten days nor more than <br />25 days prior to the date of the hearing. In computing the notice period, <br />the day of publication is not to be included, but the day of the hearing is <br />to be included. <br />2.7.7 Notice Requirements for Class B Special Use Permits <br />Notice Requirements for Class B Special Use Permits shall follow the procedures in <br />Section 2.12.6. <br />2.7.8 Nature of Proceedings <br />(A) The review of Special Use Permit applications shall be conducted during a public <br />hearing by the decision-making board. <br />(B) The review of a Special Use Permit application is a quasi-judicial process, where <br />the Board responsible for rendering a decision acts much like a panel of judges. <br />The Board hears factual evidence and sworn testimony presented at an <br />evidentiary hearing, and then makes findings of fact supported by competent, <br />substantial, and material evidence. <br />(C) The chair or presiding officer of the hearing shall swear all parties intending to <br />present evidence or testimony during the hearing. <br />(D) The chair or presiding officer may take whatever action is necessary to limit <br />testimony to the presentation of new factual evidence that is material to the <br />application, to ensure fair and orderly proceedings, and to otherwise promote the <br />efficient and effective gathering of evidence. Such actions may include: <br />(1) Barring the presentation of obvious hearsay evidence, <br />(2) Barring the presentation of non-expert opinion, <br />(3) Interrupting digressions into immaterial testimony, <br />(4) Interrupting repetitive testimony, <br />(5) Reasonably limiting the time allotted each witness or cross-examination, <br />(6) Providing for the selection of spokespersons to represent groups of <br />persons with common interests, <br />(7) Interrupting personal attacks, and/or <br />(8) Ordering an end to disorderly conduct. <br />(E) Where the Board finds compliance with the general standards, specific rules <br />standards governing the specific use, and that the use complies with all required <br />regulations and standards, the application must be approved unless the Board <br />shall also find, in some specific manner, noncompliance with a general standard <br />that if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan <br />as submitted: <br />(1) the use will not maintain or promote the public health, safety and <br />general welfare, if located where proposed and developed and operated <br />according to the plan as submitted <br />(2) the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property or, if <br />so, is a public necessity; and, <br />Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5" <br />Formatted: Indent: Left: 1" <br />Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5" <br />Formatted: Indent: Left: 1" <br />Comment [JCB19]: This is confusing because <br />“general standards” likely is a reference to the case <br />law minimum for guiding standards which are <br />codified at 5.3.2(A) …but one (and only one) of <br />those three general standards is listed below as a <br />subsection to this. <br />Comment [JCB20]: Clarification, I believe the <br />intent was specific standards. <br />Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5" <br />Formatted: (none) <br />Formatted: (none) <br /> 18