Browse
Search
ORC agenda 090716
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Ordinance Review Committee
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
ORC agenda 090716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 11:54:20 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 11:34:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/7/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 7: Subdivisions <br /> Section 7.8: Access and Roadways <br /> <br /> <br />Orange County, North Carolina – Unified Development Ordinance Page 7-15 <br /> <br />(b) Ten years from the date of recordation of the parent tract if the lot <br />being subdivided was created using the three-lot private road <br />justification provision. <br />The parent tract, for the purpose of this provision, is the lot or tract of land that is <br />being subdivided. <br />(2) All resulting lots meet the minimum lot area per dwelling unit and maximum <br />density requirements for the zoning district, including any overlay district, in <br />which the subdivision is located. <br />(B) A minor residential subdivision of three or fewer lots shall be encouraged to provide a <br />private access easement for one adjacent lot to access the private road in order to <br />reduce the number of access points on a public road. <br />(C) Minor Subdivisions utilizing the Flexible Development – Conservation Cluster subdivision <br />option shall comply with Common Open Space requirements as detailed in Section 7.12 <br />in lieu of the private road justification requirements and standards listed in Section F <br />below.18 <br />(D) For all other subdivisions the Planning Board and the Board of County Commissioners (in <br />the case of major subdivisions) and Planning staff (in the case of minor subdivisions) <br />shall consider the design features in this subsection (87.8.4)19 when determining whether <br />to permit private roads. <br />(E) There is no right to a private road in any subdivision containing more than three lots. <br />(B)(F) At a minimum, a private road may be justified if the subdivision meets standards of (1) <br />below and at least two other design features (2 through 7) listed below. <br />(1) The location and design of the subdivision is such that it clearly preserves the <br />rural character of the County through: <br />(a) The provision of lot sizes and building setbacks significantly greater <br />than those required by the zoning district in which the proposed <br />subdivision is located, including any overlay district requirements, in <br />accordance with the following standards: <br />(i) Lot Sizes – Conventional Subdivision <br />a. All lots in the subdivision must be at least 80,000 square <br />feet if the minimum lot size or area per dwelling unit of <br />the zoning district is 40,000 square feet or less. <br />b. All lots must be at least 120,000 square feet (2.75 acres) <br />if the minimum lot size or area per dwelling unit of the <br />zoning district is 80,000 square feet. <br />c. All lots must be at least 130,680 square feet (three <br />acres) if the minimum lot size or area per dwelling unit of <br />the zoning district is 87,120 square feet (two acres). <br />d. All lots must be at least five acres for all other cases. <br />e. Minimum building setbacks for lots located on a private <br />road shall be twice those required. <br />(ii) Lot Sizes – Cluster Subdivision or- Flexible Development – <br /> <br />18 The goal is to allow for a further reduction of minimum lot area with the preservation of open space <br />incorporating adaptive wastewater treatment techniques. Current design standards do not support stated <br />BOCC/staff goals of allowing for the further clustering of lots with dedication of additional open space. <br />19 Staff is correcting an erroneous section reference. Section 8.8.4 deals with ‘non‐conformities’ and not <br />subdivision road design standards. <br /> 61
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.