Browse
Search
ORC agenda 070616
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Ordinance Review Committee
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
ORC agenda 070616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 11:54:10 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 11:33:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/6/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rise certification from the NC Department of Public Safety National Flood Insurance Program or, b) be located on a <br />slope greater than 15%, or c) disturb natural areas as identified in the Inventory of Natural Areas and Wildlife <br />Habitats of Orange County, NC. Reservation of rights-of-way and/or easements to adjacent parcels shall be <br />required if the adjacent parcel will need to access the shared driveway, limited access street, or marginal access <br />street if/when the adjacent parcel develops.15 <br />14. A justification for any deviation to development standards must state a public benefit or purpose. <br />15. All parcels shall provide for interconnectivity between parking areas if determined necessary by Planning staff. <br />16. Subdivisions proposing private roads are subject to larger setbacks and minimum lot sizes than those listed in the <br />Dimensional and Ratio Standards. Refer to Section 7.8.4 for additional requirements. Refer to Section 7.8.5 for <br />private road standards. <br />17. Proposed subdivisions shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 2.16. <br />18. See Section 5.3.2(C) for standards for uses requiring a Class A Special Use Permit. <br /> <br /> <br />15 Staff is suggesting the addition of this standard because it is generally good planning practice to minimize the <br />number of curb cuts along major roadways. This language is identical to the proposed language for the EDH-2, 4, <br />and 5 districts. Insertion of this standard causes the automatic renumbering of remaining standards. The County <br />Attorney’s office is currently reviewing the language in standard #13 so the language shown is subject to change. <br /> 25
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.