Orange County NC Website
VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />5.Public Hearings <br />a. Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment Related to Temporary Health <br />Care Structures — Public Hearing Closure and Action (No Additional Comments <br />Accepted) <br />The Board considered receiving thePlanning Board recommendation, closing the <br />public hearing, and deciding accordingly and/or adopting the Statement ofConsistency and <br />the Ordinance amending theUnified DevelopmentOrdinance (UDO) regarding temporary <br />health care structures as recommended by the Planning Boardand staff. <br />Ashley Moncado, Orange County Planning and Inspections, said this item was <br />presented at the May Quarterly Public Hearing (QPH). She said no modifications were made <br />after the QPH. She said the amendment was presented at theJune Planning Board Meeting, <br />and the Planning Board voted 10-2 to recommendapproval of the Statement ofConsistency; <br />and 9-3 to recommend approval of theproposed amendment. She said all comments from the <br />Planning Board meeting can be found on page 8 within attachment 2. <br />Commissioner Price asked if there had been any collaboration withthe municipalities. <br />Ashley Moncado said the Town of Hillsborough is pursuing an amendment to <br />implement the session law, and there havebeen no comments from the other jurisdictions <br />despitenotification of the proposed amendment being sent to them. <br />A motion wasmade by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner Burroughs to <br />close the public hearing. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Commissioner Dorosin said he will vote against it. He said he knows it is a directive <br />fromthe State, but he finds it a poor way todo policy. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said atthe lastBOCC meeting, the Commissioners had <br />discussed about developingsomething specific to OrangeCounty with broader parameters, <br />and he encouraged the Board to pursue this. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said the Board needs to re-visitthepolicy that no more than 3 <br />unrelated persons can live together as this could be a violation of civil rights, and asked if staff <br />couldrevise this. <br />Ashley Moncado said staff is interested in pursuing thesechanges as well, butneeded <br />to get this text amendment done first and thenreview changes to it. <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked what wouldhappen if the Board rejected this law. <br />Ashley Moncado said theState law wouldtrump County law. She said she spoke with <br />the County Attorney's office regardingmodifying the language, and changes willbe pursued. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said it doesnot matter if theBoard passes this amendment. <br />Ashley Moncado said that is correct. She said theState law wouldtrump the County's <br />refusal to pass it, butpotential future changes could make the amendment more flexible and <br />accommodating. <br />Commissioner Pricesaid she has concerns withthe residency requirement. She asked <br />if there is a definition of, or process, to determine who is a resident. <br />Ashley Moncado said this was a concern with the planning board members as well, and <br />staff knows that this needs to be explored more thoroughly. <br /> 39