Browse
Search
ORC agenda 110415
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Ordinance Review Committee
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
ORC agenda 110415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 11:53:38 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 11:31:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/4/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 7/1/2015 <br />6 <br /> 246 <br />Paul Guthrie: Are you going to call the vote. 247 <br /> 248 <br />Vote 10 to 2 (Paul Guthrie/Lydia Wegman*) 249 <br /> 250 <br />Paul Guthrie: I didn’t like it. 251 <br /> 252 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Motion to approve the amendment as in the packet UDO amendments. 253 <br /> 254 <br />James Lea: What page is that on? 255 <br /> 256 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: 73 attachement 3. 257 <br /> 258 <br />Motion by Buddy Hartley. Seconded by Bryant Warren. 259 <br /> 260 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: This is the section in red we discussed where it says the submittal requirements and so 261 <br />forth. This document is very much driven by the state law. 262 <br /> 263 <br />Ashley Moncado: Yes 264 <br /> 265 <br />Vote: 9 to 3 (Lydia Wegman, Lisa Stuckey and Paul Guthrie) 266 <br /> 267 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Paul would you like to say anything. 268 <br /> 269 <br />Paul Guthrie: Bad law, we can deal with the issue without it. 270 <br /> 271 <br />Lisa Stuckey: I’m voting no simply because I don’t think we have all the facts. This is something worth 272 <br />asking the attorney whether it could be made less restrictive to include nonrelatives to be in compliance 273 <br />with other areas of our UDO to allow husband and wife to be in there together so I just feel like I would 274 <br />rather let the attorney guide us, something for county commissioners to ask the attorney. 275 <br /> 276 <br />Lydia Wegman: I agree with Lisa. I’m concerned about approving just this piece without having the other 277 <br />pieces. We’ve talked about going forward with it so it’s clear that we are presenting a whole package of 278 <br />options to people who are facing this situation. We may need to follow up on Lisa’s suggesti on and we 279 <br />many need to approve this but I would like to see if there is a way at the same time to approve something 280 <br />that is broader and meets the needs of many more people in the county. 281 <br /> 282 <br />****** 283 <br /> <br /> * Red text was added to the June 3, 2015 minutes to accurately present the vote regarding this item on July 2, 2015 following Planning Board adoption. <br /> <br /> 36
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.