Browse
Search
ORC agenda 040115
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Ordinance Review Committee
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
ORC agenda 040115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 11:52:59 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 11:27:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> <br />large-scale commercial operations within the County, with an emphasis on property <br />located within the: <br />a. Commercial Transition, <br />b. Commercial-Industrial Transition, and <br />c. Economic Development Transition <br />Activity Nodes (please see attached map of the Future Land Use Map of the <br />Comprehensive Plan for additional detail). <br />Current sign regulations limit the total allowable square footage for freestanding and <br />wall signs for most non-residential general use zoning districts to 32 square feet (8 <br />feet by 4 feet in size) regardless of the property’s location (in or outside of an Activity <br />Node), size of parcel, or amount of road frontage. <br />There is a concern that current regulations do not offer a suitable distinction between <br />development within various identified Activity Nodes (i.e. more urban areas of the <br />County) and rural areas allowing for a sign of suitable size to accommodate a non- <br />residential project on a larger parcel of property. <br />The ‘one-size fits all’ sign limit may, in fact, be a deterrent to non-residential <br />development in the aforementioned Activity Nodes. <br />There is also a noticeable lack of clarity within the UDO addressing the development <br />of large-scale properties with multiple tenants necessitating the need for a larger, <br />freestanding sign, advertising local businesses and on what constitutes a <br />blinking/flashing sign leading to enforcement concerns. <br />The proposed amendment(s) seek to address these concerns. <br /> <br />2. Analysis <br />As required under Section 2.8.5 of the UDO, the Planning Director is required to: <br />‘cause an analysis to be made of the application and, based upon that analysis, <br />prepare a recommendation for consideration by the Planning Board and the Board of <br />County Commissioners’. <br />The amendments are necessary to address current concerns over advertising needs for <br />development within the urban-designated areas of the county (i.e. the Commercial <br />Transition and Commercial-Industrial Transition Activity Nodes) and clarify the prohibition <br />on the use of blinking/flashing signage by incorporating new definitions into the UDO. <br />Staff will also be using this amendment process to incorporate an interpretation relating to <br />the use of digital displays by gas stations. Historically gas stations have displayed gas <br />prices through an internally/externally illuminated reader board. These displays create <br />unnecessary glare for motorists. Orange County has allowed gas stations to incorporate <br />digital reader board displays to advertise gas prices, reducing glare and eliminating <br />issues of light trespass either through cracked message boards allowing undiffused light <br />to escape or misaligned external light fixtures creating glare for motorists. <br /> <br />3. Comprehensive Plan Linkage (i.e. Principles, Goals and Objectives) <br />Land Use Goal 4: Land development regulations, guidelines, techniques, and/or <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.