Browse
Search
BOA agenda 081318
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
BOA agenda 081318
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 11:00:07 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 10:58:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/13/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 11 <br />until such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed.All electronic devices such ascell phones, 1 <br />pagers, and computers should please be turned off or set to silent/vibrate.2 <br />3 <br />The Board of Adjustment is a quasi-judicial administrative body established in accordance with the provisions of local 4 <br />regulations and State law to perform specifiedfunctions essential to the County’s planning program. Action(s) taken by the 5 <br />board are based solely on competent, substantial, and material evidence presented during a previously scheduled and 6 <br />advertised public hearing on a specific item.As detailed within Section 2.12.2 of the UDO the Board chair reserves the 7 <br />right to exclude evidence and testimony that is deemed: ‘incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious’ and 8 <br />therefore fails to reasonably address the issues before the Board of Adjustment.While it should be noted there is no time 9 <br />limit on the presentation of evidence, the Chair asks that the presentation of evidence be consistent with established 10 <br />policies, rules of procedure, and acceptable levels of decorum to ensure a fair and equitable hearing for all parties.11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />AGENDA ITEM 5: CASE A-3-18– Public Hearing to begin reviewing an application 14 <br />appealing the final determination of the Planning Director, as articulated in an October 15 <br />13, 2017, letter, concerning a parcel of property located at the intersection of Morrow 16 <br />Mill and Millikan Roads (PIN: 9729-50-7168) owned/operated by Southeast Property 17 <br />Group LLC (a.k.a. Wild Flora Farm) care of Ms. Kara Brewer. 18 <br />19 <br />Review of this item at the May 7, 2018, meeting shall be limited to the Board 20 <br />reviewing/acting on a request from the applicant to issue subpoenas compelling the 21 <br />submittal of information deemed essential to the proceeding. 22 <br />23 <br />Karen Barrows asked whether there was anyonewho wishedto speak who neededto be sworn in.24 <br />25 <br />Michael Harvey said two attorneyswould be presenting arguments this eveningconcerning the issuance of subpoenas.26 <br />There would be no need to swear in witnesses unless either attorney wished to call one for testimony.27 <br />28 <br />Michael Harvey said this is a convening of a hearing to begin reviewing anappeal application concerning the October 29 <br />13, 2017, determination made bythe Planning Director. He noted that in the abstract the attorneysfor the applicants as 30 <br />well as the impactedproperty owners have filed a joint request that is contained in Attachment 2 beginning onPage 62 31 <br />of the agenda packet that the board first address the denial of the subpoena request bythevice chair. That is the sole 32 <br />discussion pointfor this evening. Both attorneys have requested that after the Board of Adjustment has made a33 <br />decision on the subpoenasthat action onthe appeal itself be delayeduntil a future meeting. 34 <br />35 <br />Barry Katz asked for clarificationthat the Board of Adjustment will hear this again. Michael Harvey said yes, the Board 36 <br />of Adjustment will hear the merits of the appeal at a future meeting. 37 <br />38 <br />Karen Barrows stated that the reasonshe had decided not to sign the subpoenas was thatBarry Katz and Susan 39 <br />Halkiotis have heard quite a bit of testimonyabout this issue. She knew if she refused, it wouldcome before this board40 <br />andher fellow board memberswould be able to give input as well.41 <br />42 <br />Michael Harvey summarized the abstract: Attachment 1, pages 3-65, is the appeal application and subpoenas request. 43 <br />Attachment 2, beginning on Page 66, is the joint correspondenceconcerning review of the subpoenas request.44 <br />Beginning on Page 70 isthe excerpt of the session law. The background of this is as follows andis articulated in the 45 <br />abstract:On July 12, Session Law 2017-108 became effective, which established the use of structures on a bona fide 46 <br />farm. Orange Countyreceived a request on October12 from Andy Petesch, representing Barn of Chapel Hill/Wild Flora 47 <br />Farm for adetermination from the county on whether the property met the requirements of the sessions lawand could 48 <br />conduct agritourism activities. This requestinvolved thestructure located on the Orange County parcel identified as 49 <br />PIN: 9729-50-7168 owned/operated by Southeast Property Group LLC (a.k.a. Wild Flora Farm), and is commonly 50 <br />95
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.