Browse
Search
BOA agenda 081318
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
BOA agenda 081318
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 11:00:07 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 10:58:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/13/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 10 of 11 <br /> 1 <br />There was agreement to give LeAnn Brown time to recover from surgery. 2 <br /> 3 <br />LeAnn Brown requested that the date that the documents requested in the subpoenas be submitted to the board be 4 <br />before the next hearingon this case so that she would have time to prepare. Andy Petesch objected to providing the 5 <br />documents in advance of the hearing, explaining that he believes he and his clients would be obligatedto produce the 6 <br />documents at a hearing and not before. Randy Herman agreed with that interpretation. 7 <br /> 8 <br />There was then discussion of holding a hearing for the sole purpose of receiving the documents. 9 <br />10 <br />James Bryan suggested holding a Board of Adjustment meeting in July for the sole purpose of receiving the 11 <br />documents. 12 <br />13 <br />There was then question of whether witnesses were required to appear in July.14 <br />15 <br />Andy Petesch said if witnesses were required to appear, he would need a much more specific list of questions16 <br />consistent with discovery rules. 17 <br />18 <br />Karen Barrows said she thoughtonly thedocuments were being required in July. 19 <br />20 <br />Andy Peteschsaid he was not waiving his objection to producing the documents earlier than the hearing on the matter.21 <br />22 <br />LeAnn Brown said the subpoenasattached to the original request ask that witnesses appear before the Board of 23 <br />Adjustment on a date certain and ask that the documents be produced in advance on a date certain. Rule 45 allows 24 <br />that. She thinks it is appropriate to requirethat. 25 <br />26 <br />The board returned to discussing when in July the documents wouldbe required. James Bryan noted the Board of 27 <br />Adjustment’s next meeting would be July 9. He suggested having the people who are subpoenaed appear at the 28 <br />August Board of Adjustment meeting on August 13. 29 <br />30 <br />Karen Barrows asked for a motion.31 <br />32 <br />Susan Halktiois told the attorneys in the room that she does not know whatRule 45means and whether it does require 33 <br />that the subpoenaed documents be submitted at a hearing of this board. 34 <br />35 <br />James Bryan said if there is nothing else on the agenda and that is the whole reasoneveryone has to show up, it might 36 <br />be frustrating. 37 <br />38 <br />Barry Katz said he was in favor of setting the dates of July 9 for the subpoenaed documents and August 13 for the 39 <br />subpoenaed people, acknowledging that Andy Petesch and LeAnn Brown had said that whateverthe board decided 40 <br />this evening, there would be an appeal. Therefore, those dates may not remain the same. 41 <br />42 <br />Karen Barrows called for a motion. 43 <br />44 <br />MOTION by Barry Katz tohave the information presented on July 9, 2018, to the Board of Adjustment with a further 45 <br />meeting of all parties August 13, 2018. Seconded by Susan Halkiotis. 46 <br />47 <br />VOTE:UNANIMOUS48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />103
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.