Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
There was then discussion of holding a hearing for the sole purpose of receiving the documents. 487 <br />488 <br />James Bryan suggested holding a Board of Adjustment meeting in July for the sole purpose of receiving the 489 <br />documents. 490 <br />491 <br />There was then question of whether witnesses were required to appear in July.492 <br />493 <br />Andy Petesch said if witnesses were required to appear, he would need a much more specific list of 494 <br />questionsconsistent with discovery rules. 495 <br />496 <br />Karen Barrows said she thought only thedocuments were being required in July. 497 <br />498 <br />Andy Peteschsaid he was not waiving his objection to producing the documents earlier than the hearing on 499 <br />the matter.500 <br />501 <br />LeAnn Brown said the subpoenasattached to the original request ask that witnesses appear before the 502 <br />Board of Adjustment on a date certain and ask that the documents be produced in advance on a date 503 <br />certain. Rule 45 allows that. She thinks it is appropriate to requirethat. 504 <br />505 <br />The board returned to discussing when in July the documents would be required. James Bryan noted the 506 <br />Board of Adjustment’s next meeting would be July 9. He suggested having the people who are subpoenaed 507 <br />appear at the August Board of Adjustment meeting on August 13. 508 <br />509 <br />Karen Barrows asked for a motion.510 <br />511 <br />Susan Halktiois told the attorneys in the room that she does not know whatRule 45means and whether it 512 <br />does require that the subpoenaed documents be submitted at a hearing of this board. 513 <br />514 <br />James Bryan said if there is nothing else on the agenda and that is the whole reason everyone has to show 515 <br />up, it might be frustrating. 516 <br />517 <br />Barry Katz said he was in favor of setting the dates of July 9 for the subpoenaed documents and August 13 518 <br />for the subpoenaed people, acknowledging that Andy Petesch and LeAnn Brown had said that whatever519 <br />the board decided this evening, there would be an appeal. Therefore, those dates may not remain the 520 <br />same. 521 <br />522 <br />Karen Barrows called for a motion. 523 <br />524 <br />MOTION by Barry Katz tohave the information presented on July 9, 2018, to the Board of Adjustment with a 525 <br />further meeting of all parties August 13, 2018. Seconded by Susan Halkiotis. 526 <br />527 <br />VOTE:UNANIMOUS528 <br />529 <br />530 <br />AGENDA ITEM 5: ADJOURNMENT531 <br />532 <br />MOTION by Barry Katzto adjournat 8:14p.m. Seconded byRandy Herman.533 <br />534 <br />VOTE:UNANIMOUS535 <br />536 <br />27