Orange County NC Website
allowing thesubpoenas to be issued. Without the subpoenas and information, there are remaining 438 <br />questions to be answered. Herposition is to allow the subpoenas to be issued. 439 <br />440 <br />Karen Barrows asked Randy Herman to expresshis thoughts.Randy Herman said he thinks it is legitimate 441 <br />to ask whether the entitythat owned the propertywas issued the certificate. He does notthink the rest is 442 <br />within the scopeof this board.He does not think it is within the scope of this board to look behind the 443 <br />Department of Revenue’s decision. So, if it is possible to rewrite the request to limit the subpoenas only to 444 <br />the issues of identity, he would be in favor of that. He deferred to the county attorney on whether or not the 445 <br />board can do that. 446 <br />447 <br />Susan Halkiotis said she had a related question. LeAnnBrown mentioned questions about thequalifying 448 <br />financial information to gain one of the farm tax exemptions. Susan Halkiotis does not know how that is 449 <br />unraveled when the question of the entities is resolved. Ifinformation was given to acquire a certificate and 450 <br />that certificate was then used to base adecision on, and the certificate should nothave beenissued, then 451 <br />the whole thing falls apart. 452 <br />453 <br />Randy Herman said even if theoretically in another case fraudulent information was provided to obtain the 454 <br />certificate, he does notthink the countycan look behind it. Hethinksthe only question this boardcan look 455 <br />at is whether the entity issued the certificate was the one that owned the property.His opinion is that the 456 <br />board does not have the power to look at whether the Departmentof Revenue miscalculated the revenue. 457 <br />458 <br />Barry Katz said this is the kind of information that the boardneedsto know and would be argued before us 459 <br />at the next hearing we have with these parties. He then said he was not sure whether Randy Herman is a 460 <br />lawyerand giving a legal opinion. He is in favor of issuing the subpoenas and that LeAnn Brown and her 461 <br />party have a legitimate right to have this information. 462 <br />463 <br />Randy Herman said he is an attorney, but there is no case lawthat he is aware of on the interpretation of 464 <br />these statutes.His opinion is based on what he thinks is a straightforward reading of the statutes. 465 <br />466 <br />Karen Barrows said she agrees withSusan Halkiotis and BarryKatzthat the boardshould allow the 467 <br />subpoenas to go forward, for the reasons they have stated. 468 <br />469 <br />MOTION by Barry Katztoissues the subpoenas.Seconded by Susan Halkiotis. 470 <br />471 <br />VOTE:3-1(RANDY HERMANFOR REASONS PREVIOUSLY STATED) 472 <br />473 <br />Karen Barrows called for a vote to adjourn. 474 <br />475 <br />Michael Harvey said that before adjournment the board needed to set the date for the next hearingon this 476 <br />case, with guidance from James Bryan. 477 <br />478 <br />There was agreement to give LeAnn Brown time to recover from surgery. 479 <br />480 <br />LeAnn Brown requested that the date that the documents requested in the subpoenas be submitted to the 481 <br />board be before the next hearing on this case so that she would have time to prepare. Andy Petesch 482 <br />objected to providing the documents in advance of the hearing, explaining that he believes he and his 483 <br />clients would be obligatedto produce the documents at a hearing and not before. Randy Herman agreed 484 <br />with that interpretation. 485 <br />486 <br />26