Browse
Search
BOA agenda 070918
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
BOA agenda 070918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 10:58:01 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 10:57:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/9/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOA minutes 070918
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Minutes\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property owner, once the property owner has broughtforward a tax exemption certificate from the 341 <br />Department of Revenue, the statute seems to require the county must accept that and cannotlook behind 342 <br />it. Aside from the issue of identityof the entities, what authority does LeAnn Brown think the Board of 343 <br />Adjustment hasto look behind the certificate issued by the Department of Revenue? 344 <br />345 <br />LeAnn Brown answeredshe thinks that is interesting andwill be a question of first impressionbecause the 346 <br />statute is new. Whether a county has the authorityto look behind the certificate has not been litigated. She 347 <br />has never seen a tax exemption certificate issued to the ownerof this property as Southeast Property 348 <br />GroupLLC or Wild Flora Farm LLC, so she has not asked that question yet because she is not past the 349 <br />identity question. She thinks the county staff should have looked at the document and said the property 350 <br />owner is Southeast Property Group LLC and the certificate is issued to Wild Flora Farm. Done. She thinks 351 <br />that would have been correct. She asserts that the county looked behind the certificate and made an 352 <br />argument that the legalformalities of corporate ownershipand individual ownershipsomehow have no 353 <br />meaning and issued an opinion which blended together a bunch of legal entities. She added that one 354 <br />reason she wanted to bifurcate the hearing was because itis difficultfor her to answer questions until she 355 <br />can see what she is talking about.She is 100 percent certain that the Board of Adjustment does not hold a 356 <br />taxcertificate with the name of the property owner on it, even if we assume that a post-issuance merger 357 <br />somehow has play here. 358 <br />359 <br />Andy Peteschsaid that was quite a bit of time that LeAnn Brown had and asked for 60 seconds.360 <br />361 <br />KarenBarrows granted that time.362 <br />363 <br />Andy Peteschsaid the question is what would this board would do with this information if they got it. Ifthis 364 <br />boardstarts going behind the Department of Revenue,there will be attorneyfees awarded to Kara Brewer 365 <br />andSPG and Wild Flora Farmbecause that is absolutely outside the scope of this board’s authority. Ifthis 366 <br />boardwants very specific additional documentation with respect to whether Wild Flora Farm LLC is what 367 <br />the Department of Revenue intended when it issued the certificate, that can be addressed. The rest is 368 <br />entirely unnecessary to determine that entity question.369 <br />370 <br />Karen Barrows asked whether there were any other questions.371 <br />372 <br />Barry Katz asked whether he understood correctly thatregardless of the Board of Adjustment’sdecision, it 373 <br />was going to be appealed to Superior Court. 374 <br />375 <br />Andy Petesch, standing with LeAnn Brown, said they could jointly respond. AndyPetesch said it was 376 <br />uncharted watersand they are unsure how a court will treat an appeal of this decision.LeAnn Brown said it 377 <br />is fair to say whatever the boarddoeswith this case, it will end up as an appeal somewhere. She believes 378 <br />there are three or four appeals on this case already. She will have to appeal because without the 379 <br />subpoenaed documents,her hands are tied to make burden of proof to this board. 380 <br />381 <br />Barry Katz said that was his understanding. He anticipated this. He then asked Andy Petesch whether the 382 <br />fees he alluded towould be directed at LeAnnBrown’s clients. 383 <br />384 <br />Andy Peteschsaidthe county would be liable for attorney’s fees, under state statutes. 385 <br />386 <br />LeAnn Brown said it is troublesome to her that the board would consider thethreat of attorney’s fees when 387 <br />making a decision on this matter. Having read the statuteseveral times, she does not think it is a foregone 388 <br />24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.