BOA agenda 070918 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Randy Herman said to LeAnn Brown, on the elementsof granting the subpoenarequest,sheaddressed292 relevance, but there is also the requirements that the request be reasonablein scope and not oppressive.293 He asked her to speak briefly on those requirements.294 295 LeAnn Brown said what we have asked for from the individuals is thatif therewerematerials submitted to 296 the Departmentof Revenue,which she thinks would exist in a fairly easy way to reproduce, that her party297 be allowed to see them so that theycan understand to whom that certificate was issuedand whether it was 298 the kind of certificate it needs to be.An argument about what you can look behind is an argument for the 299 hearing in chief, she said.The dates for these entities do notmatch the date of the certificate. Wild Flora 300 Farmdid not existwhen the certificate was issued, forexample; therefore, she thinks it was unlikely that the 301 certificate was issued to that entity.She said as far as the legal relationship between Chris and Kara302 Brewer, the Brewerscan put down husband and wife, no big deal. She thinks it is appropriate forher party303 to askforthis information. She said she does not think it is oppressive to ask for this information. In order to 304 use this farm exemption, she thinks the property owner has to indicate a willingness to provide this 305 informationin order for others to support that the property owner is entitled to this exemption.She said her 306 party hasnot intended to look for deep, dark secrets. She reviewed that her party hasasked for information 307 submitted to the North Carolina Department of Revenueand Orange Countyregarding eligibility and 308 compliance under these statutory provisions, as well as the relationship. She wants to know, for example, 309 whether the entities were merged. She said Andy Petesch has argued to Orange County and to this board310 that somehow this is all the same thing. She does notthink it isoppressive or unreasonable to submit to 311 this boardthe packet submitted to obtain the certificate. She said the argument that Michael Harvey has all 312 of this information is incorrect. The agenda packet includes what Michael Harvey has. 313 314 Randy Herman said the board has documentation of the merger showing that Wild Flora Farm LLC and315 Southeast Property Group LLChavemerged andSPG was previously operating under the assumed name 316 Wild Flora Farm, so even if there was an issue about the identity at the time that the letter was issued, it 317 seems to himthat it is possible that the issue would be moot at this point because the identities have all 318 merged. He asked if LeAnn Brown would like to address that. 319 320 LeAnnBrown said the reason we have requested thesesubpoenasis to answer some of these questions. 321 She said the questions Randy Herman asked her presupposed she knows the answers to those questions 322 in those documents. She said what she knows isthat the Department of Revenueissued a certificateon323 October 17, 2017, to Wild Flora Farmwithout an LLC attached to it and to KaraBrewer. She also knows324 that three weeks later, Southeast Property Group LLC filed an assumed name certificate, Wild Flora Farm,325 no LLC. She knows that Wild Flora FarmLLC was created on February 14, 2017, and that a merger 326 occurred on February 19, 2018. That information answers no questionsfor herabout what information was 327 shown to the Department of Revenue – whose revenue was being used – to determine whether the 328 property owner was entitled to a certificate or what that certificate was.The document Andy Peteschgave 329 to the boardis excellent evidence of why her party needs the subpoenas so that her party and the board 330 can understand how entities that did not exist when the certificate was issued play a role in whether that 331 certificate does appropriately apply to this property. She said if there is nothing in the documents to call into 332 question which entity it is and whetherthat entity isthe owner, (which she would submit to the board that it 333 still is not), if we look at the materials and the materials do notsupport anythingshe wishes to argue, then 334 she supposed it would make her hearings somewhat shorter, she said.Her party is asking the board to let 335 them all know what they are dealing with. She saidAndy Petesch can argue once everyone hasseen the 336 information.Michael Harveyand John Robertshave not seen it.337 338 Randy Herman said putting aside the issue of the identities, LeAnn Brown has also talked about the length 339 of time the income was reported, but it seems to him looking at the statute, assuming we have the correct 340 23