Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-21-2000-5b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 11-21-2000
>
Agenda - 11-21-2000-5b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 11:42:17 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:16:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/21/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 11-21-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
RES-2000-105 Resolution Referring the Shaping of Orange County's Future Report Revelant to Advisory Boards
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Slas /o~ 0~1- ~'~ <br />1 5. SHAPING ORANGE COUNTY'S FUTURE REPORT - <br />2 Environment and Resource Conservation Director David Stancil gave this report. He <br />3 presented a PowerPoint presentation. The Shaping Orange County's Future task force included <br />4 30 citizens who met far three and a half years and developed some recommendations in April <br />5 2000. The task force was asked to develop a quality growth strategy for the entire County, develop <br />6 a community building component to the strategy, and develop a process for maintenance of <br />7 community in every part of the County. The task force made some projections of the growth in <br />s Orange County by the year 2030. Taking the growth in Orange County over the past 30 years, the <br />9 population in the year 2030 could be 178,740. The task force also projected that 46% of the <br />to County's land area would be developed. <br />11 Ellen Ironside summarized several areas of the SOCF report. In summary, she noted <br />12 the values that the task force identified as follows: <br />13 <br />14 1) sustainable renewable use of resources and environmental stewardship through. <br />15 joint planning, cooperation, and action; <br />16 2) towns which are friendly and accessible, centers of education, culture, and civic life; <br />17 3) places where individuals and neighborhoods thrive along with businesses and <br />18 institutions that serve their needs; <br />19 4) rural areas which retain natural visual and economic resources by maintaining the <br />20 integrity of forests, streams, and open space through voluntary incentives, thus <br />21 preserving the land's continuing potential for agriculture and other uses; <br />22 5) the development of children and youth as well as adult citizens in various phases of <br />23 their lives, by providing excellent elementary and secondary education, cultural <br />24 experiences and life-long teaming opportunities; <br />2s fi) a strong commitment to the well-being of all individuals, young, and old, of any race <br />26 or ethnicity, and with any disability by providing for basic physical and social needs; <br />27 7) governance that provides necessary public services efficiently, proactively <br />28 establishes collaborative ties within the region and state, encourages civic <br />29 participation, and is fully representative of all the County's citizens, responsive to <br />3o their needs, consistent and fair, .socially just in decision making, and accountable for <br />31 the promises made on behalf of citizens; <br />32 8) a shared sense of community -civil, collaborative, vibrant, friendly, caring, and both <br />33 diverse and inclusive where citizens feel responsible to and for one another, where <br />34 involvement in community life is both encouraged and anticipated, where the <br />35 contributions of all are welcome and respected. <br />36 <br />37 Norm Gustaveson made reference to the recommendations and asked that the Board of <br />38 County Commissioners read the recommendations very carefully and look at the issues which are <br />39 identified in the report. He said that in looking at the governmental structure, the concern was the <br />4o issue that somehow all parts of the County should be represented an the County Board of <br />41 Commissioners. A second big question is the interlocal and regional planning. The idea, of a <br />4z growth management board may be one of the best ways to keep track of growth in the County. He <br />43 said that it is hoped that two-thirds of the future growth will be placed in those places that already <br />44 have water and sewer. The report suggests an evaluation of a growth management budget. He <br />45 said that the big question was the importance of being sure the open space in Orange County was <br />46 not lost. <br />47 Carl Shy talked about transportation and environmental water issues and a diverse <br />48 economy. He said that the vehicle miles traveled were expected to double by the year 2030. The <br />49 major way to reduce the number of vehicle miles is to place incentives or restrictions on the use of <br />So cars. The report has several suggestions to be sure that the vehicle miles do not double in the <br />51 next thirty years. These include park and ride lots, public transportation nodes, low emission <br />52 vehicles, etc. Regarding water quality, the committee hopes to drive growth away from <br />53 watersheds. The task force hopes that incentives will be used to encourage people to use Less <br />54 water. The conservation of water will reduce the cost of new reservoirs and water supply. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.