Browse
Search
Item - Agenda w-Hillsborough 03-22-2004
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 03-22-2004
>
Item - Agenda w-Hillsborough 03-22-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2018 3:59:55 PM
Creation date
8/14/2018 3:57:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/22/2004
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
infrastructure and develop the west fork Eno River reservoir and its loss of utility revenues <br />with the closing of the Town's largest utility customer (Flint Fabrics, approximately 40% of <br />the Town's total water consumption). The Town's Water and Sewer Advisory Committee <br />has further acknowledged that it is difficult, perhaps even impossible, for the Town to fully <br />justify the use of double utility rate for out -of -town customers <br />The standard financial model for North Carolina municipal water /sewer utilities is that of an <br />enterprise operation or one in which all utility costs (capital reserve, equipment <br />replacement, debt service, personnel, maintenance, power, chemicals, billing, etc.) are <br />recovered entirely through a utility's rate and fee structure. It is not uncommon, however, <br />for shortfalls in utility revenues or a municipal utility fund to be addressed by transferring <br />funds from a municipality's general fund or fund balance reserves. Furthermore, some <br />portion of most utilities' capital and operating costs have historically been subsidized by <br />sales tax revenues legislatively earmarked for that purpose for from other municipal <br />funding sources such as bonds or grants. <br />Anecdotal evidence indicates that charging double or nearly double the in -town utility rates <br />for out -of- customers is the norm for nearly every municipally owned and operated utility in <br />North Carolina. Utilities local to Orange County (with the exception of OWASA, which in <br />independent of a local government) including Durham, Oxford, Mebane, Graham, <br />Pittsboro, and Burlington utilize a utility rate structure in which the out -of -town rate <br />approaches or even exceeds double the in -town rate. <br />The historical precedents of utility funding and rate - setting procedure are undoubtedly a <br />primary cause for continuing the practice of charging out -of -town customers a much higher <br />rate than in -town customers. Aside from the fact that any municipality's general fund is <br />the ultimate guarantor of the solvency of its utility operation, there is unlikely to be <br />significant present -day evidence that would demonstrate that the cost of providing utility <br />service to out -of -town customers is more than marginally greater than providing service to <br />in -town customers for most municipal utilities. In general, capital costs incurred in the <br />extension of utility service to new out -of -town development are paid in full by that <br />development (and recovered in sale /rental prices of new homes and building space). <br />Capital costs incurred in the extension of utility service to existing out -of -town <br />developments or neighborhoods are paid or by assessments on the individual property <br />owners in those existing neighborhoods. Capital costs associated with improvements to or <br />expansion of treatment facilities are generally captured by capital facilities fees. Actual <br />operating costs for a collection sub - system generally depend on the type of collection <br />system, the topography and geology of the service area(s) and its physical proximity to a <br />utility's maintenance facilities (out -of -town service areas could actually be closer than <br />across -town but still in -town areas). <br />The BOCC has communicated its concern and Hillsborough's out -of -town water <br />customers have communicated outright dissatisfaction to Town officials as to the Town's <br />practice of applying double utility rates to out -of -town customers. However, the Town has <br />continued to decline to modify the practice. The Town's decisions against changing the <br />rate structure is not particularly counter - intuitive in the sense that, with half the customer <br />base in town and half out, modifying the rate structure such that in -town customers receive <br />a 50% rate increase would provide out -of -town customers with only a 25% rate decrease. <br />draft <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.