Browse
Search
Item - Agenda w-Hillsborough 03-22-2004
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 03-22-2004
>
Item - Agenda w-Hillsborough 03-22-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2018 3:59:55 PM
Creation date
8/14/2018 3:57:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/22/2004
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
reduced to 1.36 mgd when the Lake Orange water level drops to two feet below full). <br />Orange County's role in the agreement is to coordinate the overall operational activities <br />related to water withdrawals; to release water from Lake Orange as necessary to meet the <br />withdrawal demands; and to maintain a minimum rate of instream flow (1.7 cfs [1.1 mgd] <br />specified to be an instantaneous minimum flow target) in the river as measured at the <br />Hillsborough gage (a USGS operated stream flow gage located south of Town, below the <br />last point of withdrawal but above the point where the Town discharges treated <br />wastewater into the river). <br />In the months and years since the agreement was first ratified, it has been modified in <br />terms of operational requirements to allow for reasonable controls and to account for <br />instream releases from Hillsborough's West Fork Reservoir. Specific operational changes <br />include: 1) modifying the low instream flow trigger (requiring seven consecutive days of <br />low instream flow) initiating withdrawal restrictions and the high instream flow trigger <br />(requiring seven consecutive days of high instream flow) curtailing withdrawal restrictions; <br />2) allowing withdrawing entities to share unused portions of their allocations with sufficient <br />notice; and 3) allowing essentially unlimited water withdrawals during periods of restriction <br />when short -term (at least 24 hours) but high (above 10 cfs) instream flows exist as a <br />consequence of intense and prolific thunderstorms; and 4) providing for higher instream <br />flows by requiring and instream flow contribution from the west fork reservoir. <br />Over the fifteen years that the Eno River Capacity Use Agreement has been in effect, the <br />specified system of controlling withdrawals and releases has worked fairly well. In general, <br />capacity use restrictions are in effect for a period ranging, on average, from early July to <br />late December. Significant deviations to the usual low flow (dry) period include the <br />summer /fall of 1989 and 2003 which were sufficiently wet that Capacity Use restrictions <br />were not implemented at all and the drought of 2002 when the low flow period spanned <br />from the beginning of April until the end of October. <br />There have been occasions numerous occasions when operational difficulties have been <br />encountered in the effort to limit withdrawals and maintain instream flow. Often the <br />outcome of these difficulties has been a period of time when there was either too much or <br />too little water was released for instream flow. Many of the problems have been related to <br />equipment failure: the water release gates at Lake Orange and power outages and other <br />failures at the USGS stream flow gage, for example. There have also been instances <br />where excessive amounts of water were withdrawn for weeks at time. <br />The processes of adjusting the release of water from Lake Orange (it is often 24 hours or <br />more before such adjustments become evident as an increase or decrease in flow at the <br />Hillsborough gage) and predicting when the users must reduce their Eno water <br />withdrawals and supplement their water demand by other sources are often unwieldy and <br />inaccurate. However, regardless of the various operational problems, stream -watch <br />monitoring of macro - invertebrate populations and water quality parameters in the Eno <br />River below Hillsborough has shown.the river to be more healthy during dry times than the <br />upper reaches of the Little and Flat Rivers, which have much larger drainage areas and no <br />water withdrawals upstream of the monitoring points. Addition indications of the efficacy <br />of the Capacity Use Agreement may found by evaluating how the system worked during <br />the 2002 drought in which this area, including the Eno basin, experienced the most severe <br />r9 raft 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.