Browse
Search
Item - Agenda w-Hillsborough 03-22-2004
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Agenda - 03-22-2004
>
Item - Agenda w-Hillsborough 03-22-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2018 3:59:55 PM
Creation date
8/14/2018 3:57:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/22/2004
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8. The BOCC has expressed a goal or at least an serious interest in adopting a <br />comprehensive and cohesive water conservation /drought ordinance that uses common <br />terms and sets common conditions for water use restrictions and conservation <br />measures applicable to all OWASA, Town of Hillsborough and Orange - Alamance <br />water customers falling under County jurisdiction. <br />It is clear that there are a number of contradictory concepts or elements contained in <br />above the "statements of fact ". It is likewise clear that it will be very difficult to refine or <br />modify these contradictory elements to achieve some level of congruity. <br />Eno River Capacity Use Aqreement <br />According to the 1987 Capacity Use report, the historical roots of the impetus to evaluate <br />and control water use in the Eno basin stemmed from the total dewatering of the Eno <br />riverbed below Lake Ben Johnson (Hillsborough's run of the river reservoir and raw water <br />intake location) for prolonged periods "particularly after 1977 ". In 1979, Orange County <br />established a water resources task force to address water supply issues. The task force <br />report issued in 1981 alluded to the possible designation of the Eno as a capacity use <br />area. Growth, rising water demand and riverbed dewatering problems continued unabated <br />in subsequent years. In July 1986 the County adopted its water conservation /drought <br />ordinance which limited water use by individual water customers /consumers on the basis <br />of the amount of water storage remaining Lake Orange; and, in November 1986, the <br />BOCC formally requested that the NC Division of Water Resources initiate a full capacity <br />use investigation. The capacity use investigation culminated with the completion in <br />September 1987 of the "Report on the Eno River Area Capacity Use Investigation ". This <br />report recommended, among other things, that the entire Eno basin upstream of the <br />confluence of the Eno and Little Rivers in central Durham County be designated a surface <br />and ground water capacity use area. During the period of time between the completion of <br />the report and May of 1989, the stakeholders in the Eno water use issue (Orange County, <br />Town of Hillsborough, Orange - Alamance Water System, Piedmont Minerals, and NC <br />Division of Water Resources [DWR]) entered into a voluntary "Eno River Capacity Use <br />Agreement" which dealt only with surface water use at and upstream of Hillsborough. <br />In accordance with the provisions of the Capacity Use Agreement, Hillsborough, Orange <br />Alamance and Piedmont Minerals have voluntarily committed to a process in which <br />limitations on the quantity of raw water withdrawn from the Eno are initiated by a specific <br />naturally occurring low instream flow condition. That is, when natural instream flow (flow <br />not supplemented by releases from Lake Orange) falls below a daily average of 10 cubic <br />feet per second [cfs] or approximately 6.5 million gallons per day [mgd] for seven <br />consecutive days, the first level of withdrawal limits are implemented. Each of the <br />individual withdrawal allocations is specified as a daily withdrawal (ex. Hillsborough at 1.51 <br />mgd) but is actually calculated as a daily average over a seven -day period (for example, <br />Hillsborough's daily withdrawal rates could [and often do] vary between 0.9 mgd and 1.8 <br />mgd over a seven -day period but still average 1.5 mgd or less for the week). Individual <br />withdrawal allocations from the Eno River are further reduced according to water levels <br />(and water storage remaining) at Lake Orange (for example, Hillsborough's allocation is <br />draft <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.