Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-2000-8j
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 11-01-2000
>
Agenda - 11-01-2000-8j
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 1:39:41 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:16:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8j
Document Relationships
Minutes - 11-01-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
27 <br />PLANNING <br />BOARD <br />RECOMMENDED <br />FINDINGS <br />8.8.2.2 Standards of Evaluation <br />The following standards shall be <br />used in evaluating an application <br />for a permit to conduct a sanitary fill: <br />a) All operations associated with the <br />fill shall conform to the following <br />performance standards: <br />1) Direct illumination resulting from the ~ x~Yes No <br />operation shall not fall upon any land <br />not covered by the application. <br />2) Equivalent sound levels at the _ x_Yes No <br />boundaries of the fill site shall not <br />exceed the following standards: <br />between 7:OOam and 7:OOpm BS dBA <br />between T:OOpm and 7:OOam 58 dBA <br />3) Vibration levels at the boundaries of Yes No <br />the fill site shall not exceed the x N/A <br />following standards: <br />steady state 1.0 inches/second <br />impact 2.0 inches/second <br />b) The Rehabilitation Plan shall be Yes No <br />referred to the Orange County Soil ~x_„_N/A <br />and Water Conservation District <br />fior review and recommendation, <br />in particular regarding the landscape <br />material specified, the planting and <br />maintenance proposed to ensure <br />continuous grovuth and development, <br />and the acceptability of the proposals <br />for the handling of lakes, ponds, etc. <br />BOARp OF <br />EVIDENCE SUBMITTED COMMISSIONERS <br />TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS <br />The site plan indicated there Yes No <br />will not be direct illumination <br />ofif-site. <br />The site plan indicates sound Yes No <br />levels will be complied with. <br />Vibration levels are not applicable Yes No <br />since landfilling is not proposed. N/A <br />A Rehabilitation Plan is not <br />proposed. <br />c) The permanent roads, defined as _x_Yes No The site plan indicates the <br />those to b'e used in excess of one access roads are 6" ABC <br />year, within the fill site shall be stone. A fill site is not <br />surfaced with a dust free material, proposed. <br />such as soil cement, bituminous <br />concrete or Portland Cement concrete. <br />d) Roads other than permanent roads ~x~Yes No The site plan indicates <br />shall be treated with dust inhibitors; the access roads are <br />to be specified in the Operations 6" ABC stone. <br />Plan, which will reduce to a minimum <br />the generation of dust from the road <br />surfaces as a result of wind or <br />vehicular action. Propertly operated <br />water wagons are an acceptable means <br />dust inhibition. <br />Yes No <br />N/A <br />Yes No <br />Yes No <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.