Orange County NC Website
L.~ <br />Introduction <br />Along with community transportation systems' maturation and NCDOT Public Transportation <br />Division (PTD) policy changes over the years, state planning guidelines must adapt to reflect <br />these changes. The PTD, based upon the research conducted by the Institute for Transportation <br />Reseazch and Education, Public Transportation Group, at North Carolina State University which <br />culminated in a final report, Reeionalizin~ Public Transportation Services, dated October 25, <br />2002, has determined that in most instances, regionalizing single-county, community <br />transportation systems can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of nrral public transportation <br />systems. Regional travel has been increasing over the past couple of decades as a result of <br />increased trip demand to regional medical facilities and employment transportation. <br />From the late seventies to the eazly nineties, PTD utilized the Transportation Development Plan <br />(TDP) process at the coursty level. With increased regional travel trends, the state must now look <br />at improved coordination, and where feasible, consolidation of community transportation <br />systems at the regional level. To investigate the potential for such improved coordination, PTD <br />has developed a new Regional Transportation Development Plan (RTDP) scope ofwork. The <br />new RTDP incorporates and merges critical elements of all of the past planning processes: <br />Transportation Development Plan (TDP), Community Transportation Services Plan (CTSP) and <br />the Community Transportation Improvement Plan (CTIl'), into the new RTDP scope ofwork. <br />For example, for a three county study area, each of the community transportation systems will <br />have a CTIP completed and a regional feasibility study will be prepared for the entire three <br />county azea. Cusent regional systems will continue to utilize the Community Transportation <br />Improvement Plan (CTIP) studies and recommendations. In some azeas, contiguous counties <br />maybe studied for inclusion with the existing regional system. <br />North Carolina has proven to many states azound the country that human service agencies could <br />rise above the turf issues to develop community transportation systems that shazed human and <br />capital resources to improve the overall safety, efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery <br />while eliminating duplication of effort. North Cazolina is recognized as a national leader in <br />meeting the coordination challenge. Nevertheless, many of the same issues of responsibility and <br />authority among agencies thaYa+ere encountered and resolved in the former TDP process with <br />human service agencies consolidating transportation maybe of concern with this new approach <br />at the community transportation system level. Some of these issues, such as standazdization of <br />adrninistrative and operational policies and procedures, system rates, reporting, maintenance and <br />organizational structwe, will also have to be addressed in the new regional approach, <br />The following planning process will research the existing approaches taken by all individual <br />transit systems in specific regions, document the results of this approach and identify <br />opportunities where coordination and/or consolidation of system service delivery into regional <br />networks can improve the mobility of the citizens of this state. The goal of this planning <br />approach is to have all authorized officials representing community transit systems within a <br />specified geographic region sign a Regional Memorandum of Understanding (RMOU) that <br />