Browse
Search
Meeting Notes 102516
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Firearms Safety Committee
>
Approved Meeting Notes
>
Meeting Notes 102516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 8:56:16 AM
Creation date
8/10/2018 8:56:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />honestly. Don’t play games with these fines. You’ve worked very hard, you’ve come up with a <br />solution that is in search of a problem. And you really ought to quit right where you are at. <br />Becky Ceartas–Is Executive Director of North Carolinians Against Gun Violence. Thanked the <br />Committee for the opportunity to speak about the important work it is doing. Her organization’s <br />attention is in helping communities in North Carolina share fact-based informationand advocate <br />for preventing gun violence.Thanked the Board of Commissioners and the Committee for <br />joining other counties inpaying attention to the role of guns in North Carolinacommunities. The <br />draft ordinance achieves a good balance in protecting the rights of all citizens of Orange County, <br />those that own guns and those that don’t. Looks forward to seeing the Committee’s <br />recommendations before the full Board of County Commissioners. <br />Roy Coe–Asked if there is a way for people to receive a warning from law enforcement officers <br />before being given a $500 fine. Said that Orange County’s current noise ordinance (Article III) <br />imposes a $100 fine for violations but allows for warnings. Also, had been a Search and Rescue <br />volunteer with a Sheriff’s Department in California for 19 years and observed that some deputies <br />are not pro-Second Amendment. Concerned that if two civilians makea firearms noise complaint <br />as provided for under the draft ordinance then that sort of deputy will be quick to issue a <br />violation. And we know if you get a violation then where ever you are shooting you will be shut <br />down. You will never be able to shoot there again. I’m not picking on deputies, but I know there <br />are some that are that way. <br />Committee Recommendations to the Board of Commissioners <br />After a quick break, the Committee turned its attention to developing its recommendations. <br />Mr. Kirkland noted that there is a lot of discussion on social media asking why the Committee is <br />going forward with an ordinance. I said earlier in the process that I did not think we have a <br />problem. As I began to think about how liberal Orange County is, I concluded that ifcitizens did <br />not do somethingnow, then in six months or two years there would be another document created <br />by the Commissioners which we would not be able to have any input on. So I appreciate that the <br />Commissioners have given us this opportunity now to work on these issues. The draft ordinance <br />is not perfect --we have some work to do–but that is why we are here now with this document. <br />At least we have some input now that we might not have in a few months or a couple of years <br />down the road. <br />He added that no reasonable person would be opposed to items (a) –(f) in the draft ordinance. <br />These provisions are the same things we have been doing our entire lives in Orange County. We <br />have not had that many situations where someone has been injured by errant rounds, because we <br />have practiced responsible shooting. We’re just putting that on paper now. We’re simply saying <br />you can shoot all you want, but just keep that round contained. You can use whatever type of
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.