Orange County NC Website
9 <br /> <br />Zero tolerance for alcoholMr. Hunnellsuggested that the ordinance set a standard <br />consistent with the State impairment level of .08blood alcohol concentration. Mr. Webster <br />replied that no one who has been drinking in any amount should be handling firearms. It has <br />been proven that people can be impaired at .03, he said, even though the legal limit for driving in <br />North Carolina is .08. A zero tolerance also would be an easier standard to enforce: the officer <br />would only need to smell alcohol on the shooter, or usethe Preliminary Breath Test deviceto <br />determine the presence of alcohol without needing to record measured levels. Breath levels can <br />dissipate in minutes, he said. The officer’s write-up need only be “yes” or “no”with regard to the <br />presence of alcohol. Mr. Hunnell replied that with zero tolerance Orange County would be <br />creating a new legal limit even though the State “with all of its greater resources”has established <br />that .08 is the definition of impairment. No, said Mr. Webster, that definition is for driving. In <br />Orange County under current law, Chief Sykes added, having any level of alcohol while hunting <br />is illegal. In reply to a question from Mr. Tesoro, Mr. Roberts said that the zero tolerance for <br />drinking while hunting in Orange County is a good ordinance,authorized by the State of North <br />Carolina. Mr. Tilley concluded that it would not be a new standard if an Orange County firearms <br />safety ordinancetolerated no alcohol level, because the standard already exists in the hunting <br />ordinance. In reply to a question from Commissioner McKee, Mr. Roberts said that Orange <br />County would not need state authorization to adopt zero tolerance in a county firearms safety <br />ordinance. Mr. Roberts noted that Chief Sykes had also asked for tools in the ordinance to <br />enforce the zero tolerance, such as a field sobriety test. We would like to be able to use any kind <br />of valid observation to enforce the ordinance, Chief Sykes replied. He also asked the Committee <br />to consider expanding the restriction from alcohol alone to any impairing substance. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that the hunting ordinance prohibits alcohol or any impairing <br />substance, and Chief Sykes read the concurring language from the hunting ordinance. “Impairing <br />substance” is already defined in the North Carolina General Statutes, and a reference to that <br />definition is in the County’s hunting ordinance. Mr. Tilley supported using that same language <br />from the hunting ordinance in the firearms safety ordinance. <br />NoiseMr. Tilley proposed consideration of a paragraph from the Chatham County noise <br />ordinance that says a complaint from a law enforcement officer would be sufficient evidence that <br />a person’s shooting is unreasonably loud and disturbing. This would address the persistent, <br />annoying, aggravating shooter, he said. <br />Mr. Hunnell objected. The language means I can’t shoot my shotgun on my 26 acres <br />because some neighbor feels it’s too loud, he said. I typically have a couple of young people over <br />to my place, take them out, educate them, and shoot skeet for 30 minutes to an hour. I have two <br />neighbors that fall into the category of the shooter that’s behind Sara’s house, he said. On <br />Sundays, their shooting is constant. But we live in the country, and they have every right to shoot <br />on their property. The language cited by Mr. Tilley is too general, he said. It means that a deputy <br />will be required to enforce against anyone who fires a shotgun--say, every 8 seconds or 10 <br />seconds or 20 seconds--after a neighbor complains about it.Chief Sykes said that a deputy has <br />discretion, and would enforce against the shooter only when there is nothing else the deputy can <br />do. Enforcement will be one of the last things we will use where aneighbor is complaining about <br />noise from another neighbor, he said. The officer would first make a professional determination <br />about whether the gunfire is unreasonably loud and disturbing. No one on our force would arrive <br />on the scene, hear the noise, determine right away that the shooting is unreasonably loud and