Browse
Search
Meeting Notes 072016
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Firearms Safety Committee
>
Approved Meeting Notes
>
Meeting Notes 072016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 8:55:36 AM
Creation date
8/10/2018 8:55:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br />situation. If we find evidence of a commercial enterprise –meaning that there <br />is compensation from the general public to use the facility –then the operator <br />would be required to obtain the appropriate permits.We have no regulatory <br />mechanism to require permitting for a private range. <br />x Planning staff approached the Board of County Commissioners about the need <br />toestablish regulations for commercial shooting ranges in the course of its work <br />revising the “recreational facility” standards. At the same point in time there <br />was discussion about the need to provide some direction or provide the <br />Commissioners with options about how to regulate private shooting ranges to <br />address public concerns over noise, safety, and what not. We attempted to <br />provide those regulations, and it was determined that the land use mechanism <br />was not the appropriate way to do that. The determination by the elected <br />officials was that the land use component was appropriate to address <br />commercial standardsonly. One consideration is that Planning staff is available <br />only between thehours of 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. <br />Craig Benedict, Planning Director, addressed the Committee alongside Mr. <br />Harvey. He saidover the past 15 years therehave been complaints about <br />recreational usesof land which hinged on whether the activity was commercial or <br />private. Those complaints have involved go-kart tracks, motor cross, softball <br />fields, and soccer facilities. Shooting ranges also were considered recreational <br />uses. We found that our regulations were not strong enough to be able to make the <br />distinction between commercial and private recreational activities. We now have <br />more specific rules about commercial vs. private recreational operations, and have <br />the clarity that Planning will handle only the commercial operations. With regard <br />to the commercial operations, the question for us is whether the enjoyment of a <br />piece of property isimpinging upon others. Is there noise, dust, glare, or traffic <br />issues, for example. Our rules on commercial shooting ranges address these <br />matters through requirements on the distance from neighbors and setbacks. We do <br />not address types of firearms or safety. Our earlier efforts to generate regulations <br />were not focused on shooting ranges per se;they were focused on the larger <br />category of recreational land uses in which shootingranges are included. <br />In reply to additional questions from Committee members, Mr. Harvey said: <br />x Applications for a Special Use Permit to open a new commercial shooting range <br />would go to the Planning Department. The Department would require a land use <br />survey. There are certain zoning districts in which recreation facilities are <br />allowed. The applicant would go before the Board of Adjustment for a public <br />hearing, which would be advertised and noticed so that adjacent property <br />owners would have theopportunity to express their support or displeasureto the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.