Browse
Search
Meeting Notes 072016
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Firearms Safety Committee
>
Approved Meeting Notes
>
Meeting Notes 072016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 8:55:36 AM
Creation date
8/10/2018 8:55:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br />Mr. Tesoro saida certain percentage of people do not act safely: shooters, drivers, <br />construction workers. No matter how many laws we put into place –OSHA, DOT, <br />etc. --at the end of the day they are not going to act safely. Let’s say you pass a <br />law that says you have to have a certain backstop. Some people will still go out and <br />shoot without a backstop. Nothing’s changed by your passing that law. There’s <br />already a law in place if their bullet hits somebody or something. Mr. Kirkland <br />added that laws are written for law abiding people. Mr. Tesoro saidno matter how <br />many laws you put into place there will always be people who act unsafely.Mr. <br />Tilley saidthe safety issue is a perception problem. We don’t have any hard facts <br />that there is a safety problem. But people perceive there is a safety problem <br />because they are hearing gunfire. You hear a guy shooting ten times, you might <br />wonder if he is shooting correctly. Based on the facts, the answer is, “probably.” <br />Hunters are sighting their rifles safely. People with concealed carry permits have <br />taken the course and understand safety. But there isa perception of a safety issue, <br />he said. <br />Dr. Arvik said that there are more armed people today than ever in the history of <br />the United States. There are more people getting carry permits and buying guns, <br />particularly women, because they are scared. They hear guns going off and they <br />think a riot is breaking out. I’m talking about preventive things here. I’m trying to <br />give the Sheriff’s Office the ability to go and check on where that shooting is and <br />whether is it OK. If they do not have the authority then they can’t make it OK. <br />Sooner or later, somebody is going to get shot, he said. The danger from people <br />who don’t get trained is higher than ever before. We have rules for after the fact, <br />but we don’t have rules for before the fact. Anyone who wants a gun can have one, <br />that’s in the Constitution. I’m absolutely in agreement with that. How they handle <br />that gun is what gun safety training is for. Can they acquire a gun without gun <br />safety training? Sure they can. The Sheriff’s Office can’t do anything about a <br />clearly unsafe situation before the damage occurs. Let’s give them the tools to do <br />something about it. Guns are noisy, but the higher priority is the perception that <br />they are dangerous. The noise regulations should be independent of the cause of <br />the noise, like someone running a lawnmower. But you can’t regulate the noise of <br />a guy with a gun shooting in close proximity to a house? What is wrong with that <br />picture? <br />What do you want the people in our community to see from us, he asked. A <br />statement that we don’t think safety is a big issue? That we are more worried <br />about noise? No, the name of this Committee is the Firearms Safety Committee. I <br />don’t want to write a noise ordinance, I want to write a firearms safety ordinance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.