Browse
Search
Meeting Notes 072016
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Firearms Safety Committee
>
Approved Meeting Notes
>
Meeting Notes 072016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 8:55:36 AM
Creation date
8/10/2018 8:55:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br />Mr. Tilley asked about the current noise ordinance. Mr. Harvey saidthe County <br />has a noise ordinance enforced by the Sheriff’s Department. Chief Sykes said that <br />firearms are exempt from the County’s noise ordinance. They are exempt, he said, <br />because there are different kinds of shooting: sustained shooting, 2-3 shots heard at <br />2:00 AM, 500 shots heard before 10:00. So, gunfire noise is a lot more difficult to <br />measure than, say, a loud party, he said. For a party we can take a reading at the <br />property line, talk with the party hosts, and ask them to turn down the volume. <br />Ninety-nine percent of the time that works. It is rare for us to issue a criminal <br />citation for violation of the noise ordinance. <br />Mr. Tilley asked if there were a way to somehow tweak the noise ordinance to <br />include gunfire. Chief Sykes saidhe thinks there is, and that the wording for that <br />should come from the County Attorney. <br />Mr. Tesoro saidone of the “problems” raised during the Committee’s June meeting <br />was “blurry line between commercial and private ranges.” Now that we have heard <br />from Mr. Harvey, he said, we can eliminate that from our list. There is a distinct <br />definition of a commercial range. There are several ideas from the June list we can <br />eliminate, he said. Dr. Arvik saidhe did not have enough information to cross <br />“blurry line” from the list. However, he said, I do not think it is the number one <br />problem. The number one problem, Dr. Arvik said, is shooting that is clearly risky <br />but no damage or injury has occurredthat would allowlaw enforcement to act. <br />Mr. Hunnellsaidhe does not consider shooting that is not causing actual damage <br />to be problematic. We already have a rule on the books against shooting without <br />regard for others, he said. Dr. Arvik said that no such rule exists.Mr. Hunnellsaid <br />that Officer Orr had referred to such a rule. Dr. Arvik said that Officer Orr’s <br />jurisdiction is hunting; no such rule exists apart from hunting. Mr. Hunnellsaid <br />that the Lenoir County language, which applies to situations apart from hunting, <br />uses language that is vague and unenforceable. Dr. Arvik saidwe can develop <br />language that is not vague. <br />Mr. Hunnellis correct, said Dr. Arvik, that perceptions are critical to these issues. <br />There have not been any injuries for a long time. But as density in the county <br />increases then it is possible something will happen. And people are becoming <br />concerned. That’s their perception. We have to do something about that. We have <br />to have something that will calm down the distrust of government and shooters. <br />We have a problem in Orange County, because the perception is the reality. There <br />are people who don’t understand the difference between gun safety and wanton <br />and careless use of firearms. We’ve made no effort to teach them other than the ads
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.