Browse
Search
Meeting Notes 072016
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Firearms Safety Committee
>
Approved Meeting Notes
>
Meeting Notes 072016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 8:55:36 AM
Creation date
8/10/2018 8:55:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br />Officer Orr saidOrange County has the authority from the General Assembly to <br />adopt a local ordinance against intoxicated hunting, but that the Board of County <br />Commissioners has not adopted such an ordinance. Mr. Hunnellsaideveryone <br />probably agrees that anyone discharging a firearmshould not be intoxicated. He <br />asked how law enforcement would handle a situation like that. Chief Sykes said <br />the Sheriff’s Office would use the tools it has to enforce the ordinance as it is <br />written. Mr. Tesoro saidthe shooter could be given a breathalyzer, as is done with <br />suspected intoxicated drivers. <br />Mr. Tilley read a section from the Lenoir Ordinanceprohibiting shooting <br />“carelessly or heedlessly in wanton disregard for the safety of others.” That covers <br />it all, he said. It is very simple: if you are drinking then that is careless. Ms. Conti <br />saidthe language of the ordinance is too vague. Officer Orr saidordinances should <br />havespecific elements that tell whether someone is in violation. For instance, one <br />law covering Orange County says that you have to have written permission to hunt <br />on someone else’s property. That’s clear for me an enforcement officer because I <br />can check if someone has written permission or not, he said. If you start putting <br />vague terms into the ordinance then it becomes harder for law enforcement or the <br />prosecution to know if a person has met the elements of the crime. <br />Mr. Tilley saidhe is not hearing people in his circles expressing concern about <br />firearms safety. People are talking to me about noise, for example, trying to take a <br />nap on Sunday. Ms. Barksdale saidthe people she is talking with are expressing <br />safety concerns, especially people living on Davis Road and New Hope Springs <br />Drive. She saidone person described to her a situation where a neighbor has a <br />shooting range that parallels a line of other homes with children and pets. And they <br />are anxious. We just learned that we have seven thousand more homes coming into <br />Orange County. We are living closer to each other and this increasing density is a <br />factor in all of this. <br />At this point, Ms. Conti asked the facilitator if it were acceptable for a member of <br />the public to video record the Committee’s proceedingsand to post it on social <br />media. The facilitator saidhe thought it was permitted, but that when County <br />Attorney John Roberts arrived he could provide more definitive advice. Mr. <br />Hunnellasked the facilitator if the person recording needed to acquire consent <br />from each Committee member. The facilitator saidif anyone on the Committee <br />was feeling uncomfortable then it was appropriate to express that discomfort, and <br />that they had the option of moving to a seat where their back would be to the <br />camera. Ms. Contisaidshe felt uncomfortable being video recorded. Mr. Roberts
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.