Browse
Search
Meeting Notes 062216
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Firearms Safety Committee
>
Approved Meeting Notes
>
Meeting Notes 062216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 8:55:24 AM
Creation date
8/10/2018 8:55:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br />Mr. Hunnell encouraged Ms. Conti to talk further with Deputy Sykes to address <br />her concerns about safety. You need to make sure those rounds are being <br />discharged safely and if they are not then they can take appropriate action, he said. <br />Dr. Arvik asked Deputy Sykes if the officers have a training program for learning <br />how to determine whether a range is safe or not. Deputy Sykes said that there is no <br />standardized trainingto enable deputies to make good, consistent determinations. <br />Mr. Tilley said that most safe shooting is common sense. Deputies should be able <br />to see what someone is doing and determine whether it’s questionable or not, he <br />said, using common sense. Dr. Arvik said that the deputy who assessed the <br />situation that he was involved with in May had determined that the shooter had a <br />backstop and therefore was safe, even though the shooter was using an AR-15 to <br />shoot into a 5/8-inch thick piece of plywood 18-inches square set up against a tree <br />surrounded by gravel. Deputy Sykes said that he agreed that most safe shooting is <br />common sense, and that the arrangement described by Dr. Arvik was not safe. <br />In reply to a question from the facilitator, several Committee members said it was <br />problematic that law enforcement training does not have all it needs –or at least <br />guidelines --to determine what is safe or not in this context. <br />Ms. Barksdale asked Dr. Arvik why he did not speak directly to the unsafe shooter <br />that he had encountered last May. Dr. Arvik said that in general the suggestion to <br />speak directly to another person is an excellent one, but that in his particular case <br />the Sheriff’s Office had earlier come to the neighborhood in response to consistent <br />break-ins and attempted break-ins, and helped to set up a Community Watch <br />program. One of the first rules they teach you in Community Watch, he said, was <br />not to get involved if you see something wrong; instead to call 9-1-1. Mr. Tilley <br />said that he would agree with that advice for a break-in, but that an experienced <br />hunter and target shooter who sees a person target shooting in an unsafe way might <br />also first try to have a conversation. Communication can solve a lot of problems, <br />he said. Ms. Barksdale said that she both agrees with that philosophy and finds it <br />problematic. She explained that a person who loved to get intoxicated used to <br />target shoot in her semi-rural area near Grady Brown school when her daughter <br />was small several years ago. The only option we had was to pull the children <br />indoors. As the population in Orange County becomes more dense, she said, the <br />rights of the people who don’t want to pull their children indoorsmust also be <br />considered. I would not have wanted to talk to that man, she said, while he was <br />standing there intoxicated with a gun. We would call 9-1-1, but that would not end <br />it.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.