Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-2000-8d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 11-01-2000
>
Agenda - 11-01-2000-8d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 1:40:22 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:16:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 11-01-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
NS Policy on Planning and Funding School Capital Projects
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Policies\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 1 5 <br />Revised for BOCC approval on 11/O1/00 <br />Environmental Factors - A school system is to pay particular attention to the physical <br />environment surrounding the site and new facility. <br />In order to avoid future flood hazazds, a facility should not be located in close <br />proximity to wetlands, stream buffers, or in a flood plain. Facility siting should <br />also avoid other physical factors that create either additional construction or <br />longer-term maintenance problems, or other unfavorable environmental impacts. <br />Once a system acquires a site and before grading begins, each school system <br />receives State approval of its erosion control plan and additional County review to <br />ensure that unnecessary cutting of trees or clearing of land does not occur. <br />Adequate natural buffers are to be left intact with existing trees, or replanted if the <br />areas aze disturbed during construction. Special attention should be paid to <br />"specimen" trees as outlined in the County land development code. <br />Road and Utility Requirements -Major elements for a system to consider in siting a <br />new facility relate to infrastructure requirements by a Town or other public utility. Tn <br />some recent instances, the systems have been required to provide costly infrastructure <br />such as sidewalks and road improvements. These elements greatly inflate <br />construction costs of new facilities. As a system begins initial planning; there should <br />be a joint meeting between elected Town, County and Education officials to discuss <br />particular requirements that all parties expect of other project partners. <br />3. Building Design Standards <br />As a school system selects a particular facility design, it is important that the most cost-effective <br />design alternative be pursued. Historically in Orange County, new school buildings have been <br />designed uniquely for each particulaz project. The Board of Commissioners encourages systems <br />to pursue non-traditional, or prototype, designs that can be replicated for use on more than one <br />project. Should a system choose a unique design, it is to provide a detailed cost comparison <br />analysis and justification in writing of why that particular approach was chosen over a prototype <br />design. <br />4. Construction Standards <br />Over the past few yeazs, the County has given special attention to defining construction <br />standards for each school level -elementary, middle and high schools. The standards provide a <br />minimum and maximum squaze footage and student capacity for each level. As a system <br />undertakes construction of a new facility, it is critical that the system adheres to the most recent <br />school construction standards (estimated project cost should include a reasonable allowance for <br />inflation). <br />The Commissioners agree to provide funding for new school facilities that aze designed within <br />the adopted standards. They do not agree to fund projects that go beyond the adopted standards <br />unless there is sufficient justification provided in writing by the Boazd of Education. One <br />justification for going beyond the standazds centers relates to co-location of facilities, in <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Policy on Planninv and Fnnrlino Crhnnl (`anital PrniantC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.