Orange County NC Website
Executive Summary <br />North Carolina has a long and proud tradition of providing services to citizens who have mental <br />disabilities, including mental illness, developmental disabilities and addictive behavior. The State has <br />built a statewide system of care valued at $1.2 billion annually. This study is part of an effort to restore <br />that tradition. It is an effort to resume North Carolina's history of innovative services, and its ability to <br />reach out to all parts of a very complex and diverse population and to support community services by <br />generating significant resources within the State and the Counties, and from the Federal government. <br />During the past decade, the tradition has been shaken. Issues of management, governance and finance <br />have made it difficult to harness effectively all of the system's resources — those within the communities <br />and the counties and those within the State hospitals and the regional centers — and to turn those resources <br />toward common purposes. There have been a number of setbacks and warning signs: the loss of the <br />Carolina Alternatives waiver for children's services; the financial crises that have closed several Area <br />Programs; the required Medicaid paybacks for certain community -based services; the recent problems in <br />staffing and record keeping at Dorothea Dix Hospital; the closing of several community residential and <br />inpatient services; the turnover of leadership at the top of the agency; and several re- organizations of State <br />agency staff. While these events are not foreign to a public mental health agency, their continuing <br />occurrence has left staff discouraged, Area Programs and providers untrusting, and the Legislature and <br />general public uneasy. <br />Among the professionals and advocates for developmental disabilities services, there is a growing sense <br />that the system has lost its ability to innovate. The national movement toward self - determination, in <br />which individuals with developmental disabilities and their families play a leadership role in making <br />decisions about their future, has not yet taken root in North Carolina the way it has in other states. <br />Services in large intermediate care facilities and regional centers dominate North Carolina's State <br />spending. The ability of the State to provide direction and leadership for developmental disabilities <br />services has repeatedly come into question. <br />This report, under the auspices of the State Legislature, and the leadership of the State Auditor, the <br />Honorable Ralph Campbell, is an attempt to put forth a blueprint for transforming the system. It does not <br />dwell on past problems, nor does it assess blame. It sets out a number of new directions, innovative ideas, <br />changes in structure, and a process for bringing together the key elements of the system in an <br />implementation process over the next five years. It does not attempt to paint the complete picture. <br />Rather, it attempts to begin the work with a number of bold and perhaps controversial directions, creating <br />a new public structure and process that will, eventually, transform the service system and restore the <br />tradition. <br />One caveat is in order. Although a lot of money is involved, money, by itself is not the answer. In fact, <br />we believe that the current amount of State spending is not necessarily to blame for system problems, <br />although North Carolina can do better. The problem is that the spending patterns are not aligned with the <br />directions the system should be taking. Too much money is being spent on too few clients. Too much <br />money is being spent on State hospitals, on small groups of clients who have been under court order, and <br />on intermediate care facilities — both small and large. To realign spending with innovation and quality <br />services for people who rely on the public service system, and to create a structure that supports effective <br />governance and financing mechanisms — these are the important challenges that North Carolina now <br />faces. <br />Section L Summary Report <br />Page 1 of 35 <br />