Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-30-2000-1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 10-30-2000
>
Agenda - 10-30-2000-1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 12:34:08 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:16:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/30/2000
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 10-30-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br />2. The County in 1997 passed a bond referendum that addressed amixture sof <br />County and Town needs, both in terms of active recreation (playing <br />programmable facilities) and low- impact recreation (walking and hiking trails, <br />picnic areas, etc.). <br />3. However, even with this bond referendum, pointed up bybeen <br />he 1999 JMRP <br />address Town and County parkland needs <br />report, such as the need for one or two district /regional scale parks that can <br />serve the whole County. <br />4. To make these and other park needs reality, the a a larger <br />to take the lead in identifying and funding new parks that serve l <br />populations in both urban and rural areas. <br />5. While many potential park sites have been lost the the areas <br />systems to Towns, <br />there remain opportunities for the Towns and <br />collaborate on co- locating needed school and park. sites. <br />6. As shown in Table E on page 11, there are $63 million of park needs that <br />have been identified, with little money programmed for parkland acquisition <br />and /or facility development. <br />VI. Map with General Areas of Consensus for Parks Needs <br />Whether for identified but unfunded parks, or new park opportunities, a general <br />consensus is desirable on where joint parks projects are needed. As previously <br />noted, these joint park projects would generally ue larger hat par would prom de (community tinge <br />district and regional scale parks of 25 acres an p) <br />of recreation offerings that serve both rural and urban opportunities o Maui would be e <br />map that illustrates both existing parks and new <br />valuable tool for planning and identifying collaborative park projects. <br />Carrboro, Chapel Hill, Hillsborough and Orange County each have anat onpte d <br />parks plan in place. Orange County will be updating its <br />ill is <br />Parks Element of the Comprehensive Plan in 2001. Master n of Chapel HThe <br />currently undertaking its first Parks and Recreation <br />report is scheduled to be completed in the spring of 2001. <br />To pave the way for collaborative park efforts, a countywide d p of <br />developed conceptual <br />park needs (a "Conceptual Future Park tip would illustrate conceptually (via a <br />agreed to by each elected board. <br />"bubble" approach): <br />1. Current Town and County park facilities <br />2. The general locationsis an identified joint park� <br />3. Projects where there need, and collaboration on <br />park acquisition and development is warranted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.