Browse
Search
Small Area Plan 1995
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Small Area Plan 1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:49:59 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:43:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conclusions <br />The Stoney Creek Basin is an area under significant growth pressure, due to its appealing rural <br />character and convenient access to Durham, Chapel Hill, and the Research Triangle Park. The <br />small area planning process is an attempt to shape this growth in a manner that is sensible and <br />responsive to the needs of residents and landowners in the area. <br />Following the charge of the Orange County Board of Commissioners, the Planning <br />Applications 223 class of the Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of <br />North Carolina prepared three alternative land use designs to assist the Stoney Creek Basin <br />Planning Group in developing a small area plan. The outcomes revealed what the basin might <br />look like under conventional design patterns and also presented two recent design concepts in <br />planning that are both innovative and forward - looking. One of these concepts, density - neutral <br />design, is based on the idea of designing for both development and conservation; while the <br />other concept, neo- traditional design, is centered on the premise that a return to traditional <br />town planning principles is a prudent alternative to sprawl development. These designs and <br />their impacts were presented to the planning group at two meetings at New Hope Elementary <br />School in April, 1995. <br />The three alternative designs presented in this report do not represent mutually exclusive <br />outcomes. Components of each design could be modified and combined to form the basis of a <br />successful plan. For instance, a neo - traditional development does not have to be transit - <br />oriented. The neo - traditional development presented in this report is centered around a <br />regional rail transit station, proposed by the Triangle Transit Authority. High densities are <br />required to support a rail transit station. A composite plan, however, may contain a neo - <br />traditional development with much lower densities than those needed to support rail transit. <br />An example of such a development is Southern Village in southern Chapel Hill. Southern <br />Village consists of about thirteen hundred homes and a village core with shopping and offices, <br />on approximately 300 acres of land. Thus, a composite plan might include neo - traditional <br />development, which may or may not be centered around a transit stop. The same plan could <br />incorporate the density - neutral concept by including several open -space neighborhoods. <br />Moreover, conventional neighborhood design may be appropriate for other areas of the basin. <br />It is also important to note that the impacts presented in this report are based on projected <br />outcomes for conceptual designs.. More specific impact assessments will depend on the actual <br />development pattern of the basin and the site - specific layout of that development. <br />The contribution of this class concludes Phase I of the planning. process for the Stoney Creek <br />Basin Small Area Plan. This report will serve as a foundation for Phase II in which the <br />Planning Group will consider these alternatives, together with two additional designs from the <br />Stoney Creek Basin Area Plan, 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.