Browse
Search
Small Area Plan 1995
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Small Area Plan 1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:49:59 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:43:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
given the poor soil percolation of some parts of the area. Also, conventional development <br />could potentially cover wellhead protection areas vital for groundwater recharge. <br />Conventional development has the lowest impact on transportation improvements, only <br />requiring traffic signals on two intersections. Although the community park proposed by <br />Orange County will be adequate to serve the entire planning area, conventional development <br />will likely not provide needed neighborhood parks. <br />The conventional design has a greater impact on native wildlife habitat. The dispersed nature <br />of conventional development threatens fauna that need deep forest environments. This natural <br />environment can be partially, but not fully, replaced through plantings required by the Orange <br />County Subdivision Ordinance. This design will also place pressure on New Hope Elementary <br />School District and could require new elementary and middle school facilities. The planning <br />area lies within the Eno and New Hope Volunteer Fire Department service radii, and is <br />covered by Orange County Emergency Medical Service. Small increases in personnel may be <br />warrented; response times should not increase significantly. This design will have a small <br />positive fiscal impact. <br />Density- Neutral Design Impacts <br />The density - neutral design option has either low or no impacts on water quality, wildlife <br />habitat and natural character, water and sewer service, supply, and disposal, transportation and <br />air quality, and the demand for parks. It has a medium impact on sedimentation during <br />construction, pressure on school facilities, and public safety resources. The density - neutral <br />option has no high impacts. <br />Density - neutral development is more concentrated than conventional design, making erosion <br />control and sedimentation during construction more problematic. This design option allows <br />for a larger buffer along Stoney Creek and provides an abundance of open space throughout <br />the planning area. This will help offset the greater concentration of lots, and therefore <br />impervious surfaces, near the creek. The concentrated nature of this development also has the <br />benefit of preserving significant stands of hardwood trees and wetland buffers, taking <br />advantage of the natural amenities. Each home has an immediate view of either forest land or <br />meadows and easy access to recreational open space. Water and sewer extensions are possible <br />to some residential clusters and may be desirable since there is poor soil percolation for septic <br />systems in some areas. This design will require new elementary and high school facilities. <br />Impacts on transportation and air quality, demand for new parks, and public safety resources <br />are the same as for conventional development. This design has a small positive fiscal impact. <br />Neo- Traditional/Transit- Oriented Design Impacts <br />The neo- traditional design is the most intense of the three scenarios, with 75 % more dwellings <br />and an additional one million square feet of non - residential development. Due to its larger <br />Stoney Creek Basin Area Plan, 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.