Browse
Search
Newsletter 1995
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Newsletter 1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:46:40 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:43:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STONEY CREEK SMALL AREA PLAN NEWSLETTER <br />This is the ninth newsletter for the Stoney Creek Basin Small Area Plan. <br />Newsletters follow each meeting of the Stoney Creek Basin Planning Group and <br />are distributed by group members from the Stoney Creek neighborhoods. <br />Background <br />On December 5, 1994, the Orange County Board of Commissioners <br />adopted the following charge: "To prepare a land use plan, including <br />recommendations for implementation, for the Stoney Creek Basin Planning Area <br />southeast of the town of Hillsborough. " A Planning Group of neighborhood <br />representatives plus elected and appointed officials was formed. There are <br />currently 22 members and seven alternates; they first met on March 16, 1995. <br />Research for the Stoney Creek Basin Small Area Plan involved <br />developing a set of alternative plans. The Status Quo, Open Space, and Neo- <br />Traditional alternatives were developed by graduate planning students from UNC <br />and a Rural Character alternative was developed by Orange County staff. A <br />Flexible Development alternative may be prepared by County staff at a future <br />date. The alternatives will be reviewed by the Planning Group and desirable <br />features of each incorporated into a recommended plan. <br />Where We Are <br />Meeting nine of the Planning Group was held on October 19 at the Orange <br />County Emergency Management Facility (911 Center) with 14 Planning Group <br />members and two alternates present. The purpose of the meeting was to receive <br />reports from the Vision and Value Subcommittees appointed at the September <br />14 meeting and to charge the Preliminary Design Subcommittee with its task. <br />The Vision Subcommittee had been given the task of condensing a lengthy <br />list of goal statements and attributes into a manageable package. Areas <br />identified as important by the subcommittee included protection of: the rural <br />landscape, significant cultural and historical features, important natural areas and <br />resources, the area's visual resources, the character of existing neighborhoods, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.