Browse
Search
Minutes 061595
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Minutes 061595
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:46:31 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:43:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
central part of the county, but is located in the northeast and <br />southwest areas. Strayhorn said his friends in the rural areas <br />north of Hillsborough couldn't get excited about their tax dollars <br />going to purchase his development rights. He said if the program <br />had been restricted to Chapel Hill Township, it would probably have <br />passed. He felt that as long as it was countywide in scope, it was <br />going to have a difficult time unless the money collected in a <br />township was spent there too. Finally, the committee charged with <br />putting the program together had to promote it too and this was not <br />the way it should have been. Lee Rafalow noted that in telling <br />people about the program last fall, he probably convinced some to <br />vote against it (although this was not his intent) because they <br />realized what they really wanted was a TDR program. <br />Bob Hall expressed concern that the Stoney Creek area could be made <br />too attractive to development through the use of incentives and <br />options as opposed to having higher densities around urban areas <br />which is what people keep talking as more logical, i.e., <br />development from the center out. Bob Strayhorn agreed and stated <br />that the towns in the county were forcing problems the on Stoney <br />Creek area by their attitudes toward growth. Lee Rafalow said TDR <br />and urban growth boundaries were talked about, but we're not <br />enlightened enough as a population to realize that this means some <br />people are going to have density close to them. <br />The conversation shifted to the proposal for a transit corridor <br />through the area. , Lee Rafalow said he had read up on transit <br />oriented development and thought it could be made to work. His <br />objective, both for his neighborhood and the Research Triangle <br />area, was to actually draw urban growth boundaries and put high - <br />density developmentinside those boundaries and not permit "North <br />Raleigh." Bob Hall said this was the basis of the Orange County <br />Land Use Plan, i.e., development should be encouraged in the urban <br />areas, this is the transition area, and this is the rural area. <br />Elio Soldi said there has to be a mechanism by which higher <br />densities become economically desirable. He thought there was a <br />lot of common ground and that the group needed to figure out a way <br />to encourage people to do the desirable thing and perhaps, make it <br />economically attractive too. If a boundary were set around a town <br />for higher density, then a system could be designed by which land <br />owners who lose the benefit of being able to develop their land <br />could be given something in exchange. The question becomes what is <br />the mechanism by which this can be done? He said if the plan <br />covers a larger area, the higher density area cannot have all of <br />the development rights, some of these will be allocated to people <br />in lower - density areas and development rights will have to be <br />purchased from them. He said a large market was needed because in <br />a small one, people with the money would own all shares in a short <br />time because there wasn't the ability to trade. He felt it was <br />possible within a county to create a market that sustains a <br />desirable trend, i.e., you can build high- density here but you <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.