Browse
Search
Meeting follow up 032395
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting follow up 032395
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:44:51 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:42:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FAX COVER PAGE <br />TO: Don. Willhoit 0 F+ AX # %2-0227 <br />FROM: one Bell a FAQ # 942 -1020, Orange County Planning <br />pr tment <br />SUBJ.. Follow-up to First Meeti tg of Stoney 'Creek Planning Group <br />DATE: March 23, 1995 <br />F'AG : X 6 <br />An follow -up to our meeting last Thursday I have prepared <br />several items for your consideration: <br />10 MeWaletter - Attached are my prelimin&ry efforts at a. <br />newsletter. My goal is to keep it to a single double -sided <br />sheet to reduce copying costa and simplify distribution. I <br />have also gone with large type to enhance readability. <br />2, Schedule Chanqes - I suggest that we use Phase I to focus on <br />the students' work. I propose that the April 6 meeting be <br />devoted to the suitability analysis and alternatives the <br />students are preparing and that we take Rural Character <br />ideas to the group at the May 1A meeting. Irm attaching <br />revised Phase I and II schedules to reflect these suggestions. <br />3 ) Consensus - I think additional discussion is needed can a <br />wory,ing definition Of consensus. However, this can probably <br />be deferred until May since the focus of the Planning Group <br />for the next several meetings; will be assimilation of <br />information rather than recommendations. <br />4) 8100sarp - I think a►. glossary of planning terms for the group <br />would be very helpful. This became obvious to me last <br />Thursday when questions arosa that Were legitimate, but not <br />germane to -the discussion at hand, i.e.,, the relationship <br />between the land use plan and zoning, Rural 'Buffer and the <br />jpAr etc. Irm, going to = to pull together such a document <br />for inclusion in the next agenda packet. <br />cc: Dr. Stephen Halkiotis, county Commissioner <br />verla Insko, Director # center for Peace Education <br />John. Link, County Manager <br />Marvin. Collins, planning Director <br />Z 'd ZOOEM616 'ON bbd ONINNVIRMOOHORHO Rd LS J I]H1, 96-H -M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.