Orange County NC Website
achieved by: <br />• Providing greater amounts of open space than required; or <br />• Providing affordable housing units either as part of the <br />development or at an off -site location; or <br />• Purchasing the development rights on farm or forest lands, <br />natural areas, and similar resources; or <br />• Some combination of the above. <br />• Water supply /sewage disposal service may include: <br />o Individual wells and septic systems on each lot or located <br />off -lot within a recorded easement, including subsurface <br />disposal or spray irrigation on open land; or <br />O A community water and /or sewage disposal system, including <br />subsurface disposal or spray irrigation on open land, <br />designed, constructed, and maintained in conformity with all <br />applicable state, federal, and local rules and regulations; <br />or <br />o Connection to a water and /or sewage disposal system operated <br />by a municipality, association, or water or sewer authority. <br />As part of such service provision, public water and sewer <br />extensions would be permitted to defined "transit corridors" <br />and "transition areas." <br />As presented at public hearing, all <br />options are to be available to landowners. <br />Stoney Creek Small Area Concept Plan <br />development intensities in certain portions <br />the Planning Group might want to consider rec <br />specific options to certain areas. <br />Flexible Development <br />However, in that the <br />recommends specific <br />of the planning area, <br />ommendations targeting <br />The Implementation Strategies Subcommittee met on November 30 <br />and December 6. A third meeting to fully develop recommendations <br />was needed, but due to the Thanksgiving holidays, this was not <br />possible. General recommendations of the subcommittee at this <br />point are: <br />1. Use Flexible Development (assuming it is approved) to <br />implement the plan. Though these items are features of the <br />Flexible Development proposal, the subcommittee reiterated its <br />support for density being based on a yield plan using the <br />underlying R -1 zoning, conventional subdivision development <br />remaining an option, and the provision of options and <br />incentives for the landowner. <br />3 <br />