Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
- 8 <br />Evaluation Criteria Summary Exhibit 1 <br />PRESENTATION 1.3 Vendor presentation of software <br />FIELD INTERFACE 1.3 Ability to utilize software in the field using a laptop computer, palm pilot, etc. <br />IMPLEMENTATION 1.6 Time from contract signing/data conversion until software is up and running. <br />RFP 1.7 Thoroughness of response by the vendor to Orange County's RFP. <br /> <br />IVR <br />1.9 Interactive Voice Response system to allow call-in inspection (scheduling) requests, and status <br />checks. <br /> <br />EXPANDABILTTY <br />2.1 Ability of software to handle more licenses than the original contract number (if additional licensee need <br />to be urchaaed). <br /> <br />WI;B <br />2.3 Ability of software to provide on-line access far permit application submittal, inspection <br />(scheduling) requests, status checks, etc. <br />EXPERIENCE 2.4 Past experience of vendor in planning and inspections software. <br />SOFTWARE 2.4 Ability of software to interact with existing county software (i.e. Novell GroupWise) <br />REPORTS <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ORKFLOW 2.6 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />.6 Standard and ad-hoc report generation via embedded reports and report generation software. <br />i ity a so re to track action ems permd app icatians, p ins m review, etc as ey move <br />between departmerlts/divisions/staff, and provide 'length of time in review' reports <br />(performance measurement). Also, ability to notify certain dep't/divisions/staffWhen an item is <br />'due', and issue an alert when these deadlines are not met. <br />SPECIFICATIONS 2.7 Degree to which vendor met our specifications. <br /> <br />CUSTOMIZATION <br />2.7 Ability of trained county employees to add new activity, permits, forms, reports, etc. to system <br />without vendor involvement. <br /> <br />MS OFFICE <br />2.7 Ability of software to interact with the e~asting MS Office Suite[V11ard(Mail Merge, form <br />letters,etc), Excel (spreadsheets), etc]. <br /> <br />PARCEL <br />2.7 Level of parcel management offered by software (does input into a permit update parcel data in <br />GI5 software and vice-versa?). <br />USER-FRIENDLY 2.9 Expected ability of software to be used by all levels of computer trained operators. <br />GIS 3 Interaction with existing Planning and Inspections/ Land Records G15 software(Arcview). <br />EVALUATION WEIGHTS <br />3.5 <br />3 <br />2.5 <br />2 <br />I.5 <br />I <br />0.5 <br />0 <br />®PRESENTATION <br />^ FIELD INTERFACE <br />D IMPLEMENTATION <br />D RFP <br />^IVR <br />^ EXPANDABILITY <br />^ WEB <br />®EXPERIENCE <br />^ SOFTWARE <br />^ REPORTS <br />O WORKFLOW <br />^ SPECIFICATIONS <br />^ CUSTOMIZATION <br />^ MS OFFICE <br />^ PARCEL. <br />^LISER-FRIENDLY <br />^GIS <br />kca:z/zs/oo <br />vendor evaluation criteria <br />EVALUATION CRTTERIA <br />