Browse
Search
Meeting 111695
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 111695
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:17:41 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:42:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The subcommittee recognizes the historical and cultural <br />significance of these properties and to the maximum extent <br />practicable, recommends low intensity uses adjacent thereto. <br />Proposed Scenic Road Corridors: Two sections of road in the <br />planning area are proposed for scenic corridors. These include all <br />of New Hope Church Road in the study area and Old NC 10 from its <br />intersection with University Station Road west to the railroad <br />overpass in the vicinity of Strayhorn Hills. The winding nature of <br />the roads, vistas of existing and former farmland, and repeated <br />transitions of forest -to -open (especially along New Hope Church <br />Road) contribute to scenic qualities along the two roads. <br />Existing Farmland: The Strayhorn farm is currently the only active <br />farm in the study area. The subcommittee has chosen not to <br />establish a separate category to set it apart from surrounding <br />properties. They felt one of the best ways to keep the land in <br />farming was by reducing impacts when land adjacent to it developed. <br />The strategy has been to propose the lowest intensity uses <br />practicable adjacent to the farm. For the most part, this is a <br />continuation of existing development patterns on adjacent lands. <br />Existing Neighborhoods: The subcommittee placed a high priority on <br />the character of existing development and proposed that future <br />development be compatible in scale. New adjacent development <br />should, wherever practicable, be of the same density. Where this <br />is not possible, a density transition from lower - intensity to <br />higher- intensity areas should be provided. <br />Land Use Intensitv Cateaories <br />In undeveloped portions of the planning area where residential <br />development might ultimately take place, the subcommittee defined <br />three land use intensity levels: higher, intermediate, and lower. <br />Higher Intensity Areas: Generally synonymous with the 10 and 20 <br />year transition areas in the existing plan or adjacent to areas <br />proposed for future development on an urban scale. Most of these <br />areas lie in the west and northwest parts of the planning area. <br />There is however, one smaller portion situated on the eastern tip <br />of the area adjacent to the I -85 /US 70 EDD. A possible density <br />range for areas classified as higher intensity might be development <br />on lots one -half to one -and one -half acres in size. <br />Intermediate Intensity Areas: Generally lie between higher and <br />lower intensity areas. The largest area of intermediate intensity <br />includes Strayhorn Hills and the area to the east bounded by Old NC <br />10, University Station Road, and I -85. A second area of <br />intermediate intensity lies on both sides of University Station <br />Road south of Old NC 10. Finally, a third and somewhat smaller <br />area west of NC 86 separates the southwestern corner of Duke Forest <br />C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.