Browse
Search
Meeting 111695
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 111695
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:17:41 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:42:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• + ► . r q • 4 <br />Landowners traditiozially cherish the ability to develop their land <br />as they see fit. Today, most landowners recogniz6 the need for <br />eo=un.i.ty standards -- or regulation --- of development, because the <br />actiahs of one neighbor can have a large impact on others. <br />The list of permitted land uses in an area may provide more <br />flexibility than a community wants, or may restrict other uses that <br />seen desirable. For example, in the Stoney creek Basin, the areas <br />zoned R-1 permit cdnst of a large country club or government <br />off ice building, a , With a s eciai -use permit, an airport, sewage <br />treatment plan , or land f i1 But the ability to build an open - <br />space, cluster -�ty1a d pment is limited. So is the ability to <br />utilize the incentives and design guidelines in some of the large- <br />lot options recommended by the Rural Character Study Committoo. <br />Stoney Creek Basin landowners. should be able to choose from a <br />variety of development options that are consistent with good land <br />stewardahip, community health standards, and Rural character design <br />guidelines. Offering landowners constructive alternatives to 2taet <br />those objectives is better than forcing them into a very narrow <br />range of options. <br />Fro os <br />The ®uboovmittee recommends: <br />(1) preserving the density. perinitt$d under currerYt zoning <br />and public health stan ards ( "density neutral based on a <br />yield plan for the land"); <br />(2) providing an array of flexible development options that <br />will encourage landowners to preserve open spaoe and rural <br />character such as those in the Rural Character Study and <br />Randall Arendt's open space development plans; <br />(3) considering some of the oreative tools available to direct <br />dense development into urban growth areas rather than <br />beyond and to create incentives for landowners and <br />- developers to preserve some undeveloped open land in the <br />majority of the Stoney Creek Basin which is beyond current <br />urban growth boundaries. Tools that pain be considered <br />within Orange county's jurisdiction include density bonuses <br />and penalties, speedy approval pracesses,- adjustments to <br />requirements for private roads, adjustments to rules about <br />sharing and placement of septic fields, tax b taksi and <br />purchase of development rights. Tools that require <br />changes in state law include transferrable Bevel pment rights; <br />(4 ) educating the entire community about land uses and densities <br />that are currently permitted; about how new tools of land use <br />policy work, and about the advantages and disadvantages of <br />different development options. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.