Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />PLANNING GROUP COMMENTS <br />Retain current character of area; preserve as much as possible <br />Agree: 5 Disagree: 2 Undecided: 4 No Response: 0 <br />Comments: Current character is large lots, trees, some vistas; <br />must consider cluster development for the greatest ultimate <br />_good; this will be difficult; don't let those who own one <br />acre rule those who own land with development potential; and <br />I like current character of area. <br />Keep density low; set a population or density cap <br />Agree: 5 Disagree: 3 Undecided: 2 No Response: 1 <br />Comments: Maybe two acre average and no commercial or <br />industrial; density neutral for now with eve on neo- <br />traditional in future; impractical; this development area is <br />all that some landowners have, let them reap benefits; density <br />cap is more useful than population cap; commendable goal, but <br />is population cap legal? <br />Provide more public lands, parks, trails..... <br />Agree: 5 Disagree: 1 Undecided: 2 No Response: 3 <br />Comments: With compensation; possibly a good tool, but not a <br />goal; not sure it has to be open to all, just needs to be <br />unbuilt; Duke Forest is open, semi - public park, but not <br />managed by public - try to build plans for trails and parks <br />into development plans for larger tracts; as it fits in with <br />planning for density- neutral and neo- traditional; set a limit <br />of one acre for every 500 residents; absolutely, this is a <br />deficiencv at this time; and depends on cost - community park <br />would be nice. <br />Save open space when area is built out <br />Agree: 10 Disagree: 0 Undecided: 0 No Response: 1 <br />Comments: This is vital ;.don't understand statement; aim for <br />contiguous wildlife corridors; concentrate home locations; can <br />be done by dedicating one acre for 500 residents; and save <br />some space as woodland, meadow, shared park— not golf course._ <br />5. Encourage diversity /sense of community <br />Agree: 8 Disagree: 1 Undecided: 2 No Response: 0 <br />