Orange County NC Website
•_I <br />Keith C��ck indicated khat lie iik ;d the Larger lots and rile Comm! inity park. <br />Meg McKean said that because total bUlldoUt would be loonier density, `11SUal character world be <br />J <br />preserved, although, more b\( aCCli�l¢rt tllai? by design. <br />�!. rlC11i ri 1. ; ! ^./ er,5 ,1 i i I y l; design. f hey <br />4 B{ 10' � � i'la li i`��' n.,. ` ;l:�i'� i ra grit -1 Clue e� b1 ll� ��: l <br />5 maintain T'reedom (o deveiop. <br />6 -� Michael liVarner rnentior,ed viarer E se weir not' bek � an t -Itii�i°r whi ;in k1i- yid : es�rict ;lL�,'eic:pf� Font <br />( to l,lvhat the lard �v /o ld, na%twr"�!!!/ bbear <br />l t a v i l e J , .w } i 1 <br />a-i 1 , G> i j 1 <br />Lee Rafaiow indicated th�.s he liked the communit;� park, flexibilit~� for land own�rs, prolii�itions <br />9 on water and sewer and restrictinc t�eveoomen' .c .,.,;,,at the land '1)/O _rid Lear. <br />!/ t liked at !'t r ;r,,nlf ,_, rs- hzai ^f n.pptii ti Iin;rj i ;1� �� i1'� i-irl <br />10 � Bob �:trayhorn indicated thin he ,il�bc:, th�.� {�+Jl irl:J t: i i\.! .? , �,�� ,;„:�i�.,ns ��� :� -ae; i� i,� a���.rn�ri , ._. , iv <br />11 Would like to see larger largyerl7 -blot slrzes. <br />12 i1 '+1n 5 {V i17110 ii. -J i.-1+ 'v-Z LL ^1 L1111L <br />�1f.,31 important to list Qti- r�i.i:ing _iia4 is ;,onsfr�er,jd �csi�i,J��+l�sDc,t ai: t.t the <br />I1t Lee t .afalQ�v� mentioned :i�'::� it was �r 1 { r! i� v 'yrC. L : 7 �i at v'i ter{ lUtvJ LO Uti iJ � i Li 1 <br />15 creation of a personal plan for this cornmunitly. <br />16 DENSITY NEUTR,',L PLAN: <br />17 Dan Teichman stated that he liked the preservation of open space and natural resources as ; eil <br />13 as prolilLltions on within the Attu zfl <br />19 a Curtis Bane spoke in support of the open space that is mi ai twined and the rl° ;{ihilit for the <br />20 landowners. <br />21 4 Lee Rafa- low +he clustering aspects which he believes create neighborhoods and <br />22 comi- nunides. <br />23 Clint Burklin liked the visual buffers along the roads and natural areas. <br />24 Michael Warner mentioned that development would be restricted to what the land would <br />25 naturally bear. <br />26 Trudy Cuffe mentioned the open space <br />27 Irene VanDyke liked that the wildlife corridors would he ;preserved in perpetuity. <br />23 Meg McKean commented that the natural areas benefit both residents and passerbys. <br />29 Elio Soldi liked that alternative septic systems are an option without increasing the density. <br />30 Keith Cook liked open spaces and the recreation space. <br />31 Kim Price and T i hea VVii ion stn indikcated chat they lilked the over "all plan. <br />32 s Bob Strayhorn and Trudy CUffe liked the open space bUt WOUld choose larger lots <br />33 Lee Rafalow supported that mixed Lases, Su%h as at�rlclii�L l "al and residential, were available. <br />S� <br />David "eltcn� mentioned that i"te i1i <ed the bUf ?r et'aveArl eXf 3tfnG -and ne`v developments. <br />35 Irene VanDvke liked that the area would not be divided into s ::all see *ions. <br />36 Bob Hall mentioned the fact that primary and secondary areas were Also, this tn— <br />37 of development would provide an opportunity iar camr�unit� to develop. <br />33 Lee Rafaiow mentioned the somewhat lower infrastructure costs associated with this type of <br />39 development. <br />40 NEC - TRADITIONAL DESIGN- <br />41 Bob Strayhorn mentioned the cornmercial area n,"F -re— in `l'trs f�A� ?gn <br />42 Trudy Cuffe commented on the open, space. <br />43 David `{eiton mentioned the buffer aro+_rnd the existing neighborhoods. <br />44 a Michael darner mentioned that he supported the open space, however, the road would need to <br />45 be removed from the design. <br />46 Curtis Bane liked the idea of public trans- portation being available. <br />