Browse
Search
Meeting 091495
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 091495
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:14:49 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:41:43 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11. Affordable housing <br />Agree: 5 Disagree: 3 Undecided: 2 No Response: 1 <br />Comments: The most affordable housing is in town where you can <br />walk to stores and schools and get mass transit, the country <br />is not the most easy place to live cheaply; desirable, but <br />not sure it can be enforced; not critical, our 6 square <br />miles don't have to be everything; too ambiguous; every new <br />rule area has to abide by drives up the initial investment to <br />buyers; how determined; and too late for Stoney Creek area, <br />land prices are too high to be affordable without subsidies. <br />Additional Comments: <br />Slow growth tends to be better managed and thought out than <br />rapid growth. It might benefit us to concentrate on this one <br />factor a bit. If larger tracts ( 50 or more acres) are limited <br />in how quickly they can "build out" to "maximum capacity" <br />(however we define that) - for example, a tract can only be <br />built out to 50% capacity in 10 years; then 50% more in the <br />next `10 years - then I believe we have a plan that allows <br />flexible growth that will preserve open space and some rural <br />character for 20 - 30+ years more. <br />With this mailing of development options I feel we are on the <br />verge of making great progress - I truly hope so. Transfer of <br />development rights is a tool that can be useful. <br />Most of the people that I talked to were appalled at this <br />group's resistance to acknowledge the property owner's right <br />to develop their lands, the trust to not destroy the <br />community's values, and the idea that the ideals of native <br />Orange County residents had some shortcoming in moral values <br />as to the development of their lands. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.