Browse
Search
Meeting 081795
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 081795
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:13:59 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:41:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J urn —cd —1 'JJ:) 1b; 15 r r :ui i UMHNUC u 1 r i U 1 Na Drti— l i UN!=i H. J� <br />M M V <br />a' 26REWAX � U D fl CREEX MEA <br />Planning Director Mervin Collins pre nted information as <br />contained in the agenda. He showed on a ge map the four concept <br />plans that have been received between Sep tuber 1994 and February 1995. <br />Comments received from the Board of Count Commissioners are listed - <br />below: <br />Commissioner Gordon said that the wo of wisdom is to revisit the <br />provisions of the dedication of land or p ent -in -lieu provisions. <br />Commissioner Wiilhoit - made reference o the conservation area and <br />asked how Craig Manor and University Trac participate in that. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the F <br />and Marvin Collins said that there is notl <br />developers want to do a cluster subdivisic <br />Commissioner Willhoit made reference <br />how that helped.with conservation. Is it <br />would like to see an effort put into enhan <br />wildlife corridor into some kind of park c <br />that were possible would there be addition <br />area. Are they required to preserve it an <br />indicated that by complying with the wetla <br />requirements,, they are preserving some of <br />ownership. A conservation easement could <br />provide more protection. Commissioner Wil <br />for this area.-to be protected. <br />'otection for the green area <br />ng to protect it unless the <br />. <br />:o the nature trail and asked <br />lossible to have both. He <br />inq the conservation and <br />incept or nature trail. If <br />1 acreage put into this <br />way? Marvin Collins <br />ds and stream buffer <br />t but it is still in .private <br />I t on top of this and <br />hoit stated he would like <br />Commissioner fa1kiot s asked if the d velopers would be more <br />hesitant to:i i messing around with that sn elike piece in the middle <br />or would they rather get you off their bac ,by working out an agreement <br />for the designated park area. The bottom ine is that a bunch of <br />homeowners don' °t want a bunch of people ru ing around their back yard. <br />Marvin Collins said that the developers ha a $ome interest in both. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked Marvin what could be done to facilitate <br />this. She later suggested taking the dedi ation of land /payment in <br />lieu provisions to . public hearing_ in .Augus <br />Commissioner Willhoit stated he likes the idea of folding the <br />recreation area into the greenway concept. He also asked that the plan <br />be shown to orange County Schools to see i they are specifically <br />interested in a school site in this area. The parcel referred to as a <br />location for a park may be appropriate for a school site. <br />Commissioner- Wil.1ho t said that this needs to be presented to the <br />Stoney Creek Study committee. It may give em some incentives to <br />consider sc me of the alternative proposals <br />Marvin Collins.said that they plan to how this map to the schools <br />and the Stoney Creek Study.Committee, Recr Lion and:Parks Board and <br />others. <br />TOTAL P.02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.