Browse
Search
Meeting 061595
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 061595
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:13:03 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:40:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />• Encourage Economic Development Commission to promote agriculture as an industry. <br />• Support purchase of Development Rights Program. <br />• Support construction of Rural Education Center. <br />• Continue to initiate dialogue between developers with natural area sites and land <br />conservancies. <br />• Pursue cooperative Planning efforts with Hillsborough, Durham and Mebane. <br />• Promote Grassroots Planning "Community vision" efforts in rural areas. <br />• Pursue a region -wide vision of growth management plan. <br />The RCS Development Options used a sliding scale of incentives (density) and open <br />space, making both conventional and open -space development options available and <br />offering incentives at both ends of development spectrum. Finally, it was made extremely <br />clear that all of.the options were the choice of the property owner. <br />The RCS Development Options were developed to increase incentives. The one -acre <br />option was included at the end of the process by the Planning Board. Landowners were <br />told that nothing would be taken away as a result of this process. Although it could still <br />be done in a different way, there was a perception that the one -acre option was being <br />removed, so the Planning Board reinstated it. <br />In response to a question, David Stancil stated that the open space requirements <br />have not been adopted by the Board of Commissioners. The Planning Board is currently <br />working on them. <br />David Yelton asked exactly how much and what type of development has occurred <br />in this area. Stancil responded that staff had prepared data on activity county -side in the <br />last 8 years. This information will be presented at a future meeting. <br />Meg McKean asked staff to report on the rate and type of growth in Orange County <br />in the last 10 years. She also requested that this information be presented so that the <br />growth in Chapel Hill and Carrboro is clearly marked. <br />The remainder of the presentation consisted of the Stoney Creek Small Area Plan <br />Rural Character Design Scenario. The goals and objectives were reviewed along with the <br />existing land use patterns in the area. A survey of the area was conducted using a <br />suitability analysis to determine opportunities and constraints. This scenario in its entirety <br />was a part of the agenda packet. A copy is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk to the <br />Board of Commissioner's office. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.