Browse
Search
Meeting 061595
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 061595
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:13:03 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:40:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
will be unable to attend at that time. Also, future meetings may be held at the <br />Government Services Center, Cameron Street, Hillsborough. <br />Land Use Workshop Report: That report will be received at the June meeting. <br />Bob Strayhorn indicated that he was unavailable on the second and fourth Thursday <br />of each month. <br />Lee Rafalow mentioned that he was concerned about the amount of time being spent <br />on abstract alternatives. He felt that a sufficient number of alternatives had been presented <br />for this group to begin its discussions about what it would like this community to look like <br />in 20 years. He requested that the group consider setting aside the agenda for this meeting <br />in order to begin clarifying its goals. He suggested discussing the alternatives that have <br />already been presented. Additional information could be received later in the process. <br />Verla Insko clarified this request and asked the group to decide how it would like to <br />proceed. After discussion, it was decided to proceed with the agenda. Members of the <br />group expressed significant interest in talking about goals and timetables as well as having <br />increased input into setting future agendas. These requests will be addressed by staff. <br />Dave Yelton asked that staff provide all pertinent information regarding any <br />planning issues which are pending either with the Planning Board or the Board of <br />Commissioners. <br />MINUTES: <br />Lee Rafalow asked that the discussion of the fiscal impact report which was <br />presented by the students at the April 27th meeting be more accurately reported in the <br />minutes. He reminded the group that capital costs, such as new schools, were not <br />included in fiscal impact report. This led to an extremely inaccurate projection. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis agreed that this omission of capital costs was a major flaw <br />in the fiscal analysis. The students were looking at teachers salaries and other smaller <br />expenses rather than including the cost of building new schools and purchasing school <br />buses. That fiscal report needs to be revised. <br />STONEY CREEK RURAL CHARACTER DESIGN PRESENTATION: <br />David Stancil presented the history of the Rural Character Study (RCS). He <br />mentioned that Clint Burklin, Judson Edeburn, and Bob Strayhorn were all members of <br />the RCS. Many tradeoffs and compromises went into the first years of this study which <br />created in November, 1987. For the next five years meetings were held, occasionally two <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.