Browse
Search
Meeting 031695
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 031695
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:57:16 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:38:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
automobile and is characterized by a vibrant town center, compact <br />residential development, mixed land uses, .and a grid street <br />pattern. Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater - Zyberk are the foremost <br />proponents of neotraditional development. Kentlands in <br />Gaithersburg, Maryland, was designed by them. As an example of the <br />scale of neotraditional development, Kentlands is situated on <br />approximately 350 acres and is planned for 1,600 housing units as <br />well office and retail uses. <br />Rural Character <br />In 1988, the County Commissioners appointed a Rural Character <br />Study Committee and charged them with identifying ways of <br />preserving rural open space with minimal impacts on affected <br />property owners. Preserving agriculture, protecting natural and <br />visual resources, managing quality growth, and providing <br />flexibility for rural residents were identified as study goals. <br />The committee found that the current zoning standard allowing one <br />acre lot development (outside the Rural Buffer) with no open space <br />was not conducive to protecting rural character. The Committee <br />felt that encouraging open space development or larger lot <br />conventional development should be a priority for future rural <br />development. <br />A set of recommended development options was formulated and <br />would be available to all property owners/ developers, to select the <br />option they preferred. Conventional development without open space <br />would be permitted if lots averaged five -acres in size (with an <br />incentives package to promote this "de -facto open space" option). <br />As a compromise between keeping the existing one -acre zoning, and <br />not allowing conventional development without open space, <br />conventional development would also be permitted if an average lot <br />size of 1.84 acres (the average lot size in major subdivisions in <br />the County) were maintained. <br />The opportunity to achieve one unit /acre density was not taken <br />away, however. Developers setting aside open space would receive <br />a density bonus. With a minimum threshold of 20% open space, <br />developers would get a bonus of 0.1 units per.acre for each 10% of <br />open space protected. A development with 20% open space would <br />allow 0.8 lots per acre (80 lots per 100 acres) while a development <br />with 70% open space would allow 1.3 lots per acre (130 lots per 100 <br />acres). Finally, the Committee recommended that a provision <br />allowing up to five one -acre lots for existing tracts of land be <br />included, and that small area plans be undertaken in each of the <br />County's rural activity nodes. <br />Summary <br />This paper has presented a short overview of the status quo, <br />open space, neotraditional, and Rural Character plan alternatives <br />being developed for the Stoney Creek Basin Small Area Plan. Fuller <br />descriptions of the techniques and assumptions underlying each <br />alternative will be in the text accompanying the draft plans. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.