Browse
Search
Meeting 031695
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 031695
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:57:16 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:38:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STONEY CREEK BASIN SMALL AREA PLAN ALTERNATIVES <br />Preparation of the Stoney Creek Basin Small Area Plan calls <br />for the development of four alternative plans. Three of these, the <br />Status Quo, Open Space, and Neotraditional alternatives will be <br />developed by graduate planning students at the UNC Department of <br />City and Regional Planning. The fourth plan, the Rural Character <br />alternative, will be developed by Orange County Planning staff. <br />Phase II of the planning process will involve a critical review of <br />the alternatives by the Planning Group. Desirable features of the <br />various plans will be retained and eventually incorporated into a <br />recommended plan for the area. <br />Status Ouo <br />The Status Quo begins with the current land use plan which <br />projects predominantly residential development for most of the <br />area. The northern 15 -200 of the area is classified as transition <br />where development can occur at densities greater than one unit per <br />acre with the extension of municipal water and sewer. Three to <br />five percent of the area contained in the extreme south is Rural <br />Buffer. Development here is restricted to two acre lots with wells <br />and septic tanks. With the exception of 450 acres of Duke Forest, <br />the remainder (60 -650) of the area is classified as Rural <br />Residential. Here development can take place at approximately one <br />unit per acre utilizing wells and septic tanks. Utilizing the <br />suitability analysis and existing plan for the area, the Status Quo <br />team will make recommendations on how conventional residential <br />development in the area might occur. <br />Open Space <br />The Open Space. alternative is based largely on the design <br />principles advocated by Randall Arendt. In general, open space <br />developments differ from conventional, i.e., status. quo, <br />subdivisions in that development is clustered on a portion of the <br />site, leaving other portions in some type of open space. For <br />example, a 100 acre tract could be developed as a conventional <br />subdivision with 47 two -acre lots, excluding street rights-of-way. <br />An open space development on the same tract might preserve 50 acres <br />of the site in permanent open space, clustering 47 homes on one - <br />acre lots adjacent to the open space. A significant advantage of <br />open space development is the creation of permanent open space <br />which may be set aside to protect natural areas, wildlife <br />corridors, scenic vistas, historic sites, or provide for continued <br />use for agricultural purposes. <br />Neotraditional <br />The American town of the late 19th and early 20th century <br />provides the basis for the Neotraditional model. Neotraditional <br />development is oriented to the pedestrian rather than the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.