Orange County NC Website
a solution that meets his or her own <br />interests. <br />The problem with focusing on <br />solutions first is that they can be <br />conflicting, even when people's <br />interests .are compatible. People tend <br />to offer are <br />after they've con- <br />sidered their own interests but <br />before they've considered the inter- <br />ests of others. In the example, the <br />two group members rejected each <br />other's solutions because they failed <br />to meet the members' own interests. <br />If they'd been aware of each other's <br />interests, they might have been able <br />to offer a solution that satisfied them <br />both. <br />Sometimes, someone just has to <br />point out that a person's suggestion <br />is really a position, to help keep <br />group members focused on inter- <br />ests —which help shape their criteria <br />for accepting and committing to a <br />solution. <br />For example, a group is planning <br />to buy a car. One member suggests a <br />six - passenger vehicle to hold all of <br />the group members. Another sug- <br />gests a fuel- efficient car. A third <br />emphasizes a good repair record. <br />Another says, "I want to buy a <br />Chevy." Others in the group should <br />identify the latter as a position and <br />then ask, "What interests do you <br />have that lead you to favor that posi- <br />tion?" <br />Once all group members have <br />verbalized their individual interests, <br />they can begin to generate positions <br />and solutions. When someone does <br />offer a solution, he or she should <br />point out how it meets the interests <br />the group has agreed on. That way, <br />the group increases the likelihood of <br />consensus. <br />Be specific; use examples. Specific <br />examples use directly observable <br />behaviors to describe people, places, <br />things, and events. Such examples <br />generate valid information because <br />they enable group members to deter- <br />mine independently whether the <br />data are reliable. <br />For example, if Vera makes a gen- <br />eral statement such as, "I think some <br />of us aren't doing their share of the <br />work," other group members can't <br />determine whether her statement is <br />valid. They can't identify "some of <br />us.1 And they can't observe people <br />not doing their share of the work. <br />Suppose Vera were more specific <br />and said, "Selina and Joe, you didn't <br />complete and distribute your section <br />of the report." The others could <br />determine the validity of the state- <br />ment by directly observing whether <br />Selina and Joe's section of the report <br />had been completed and distributed. <br />Agree on the meanings of important <br />words. This ground rule is an exten- <br />sion of "be specific; use examples." <br />Whether group members agree or <br />disagree, the same word can mean <br />different things to them. <br />For example, one of the ground <br />rules requires that a group make <br />decisions by consensus. To some <br />members, consensus means that a <br />majority agrees. To others, it means <br />unanimous agreement. The first time <br />the group makes a decision that gets <br />majority, but not unanimous, sup <br />THE SAME WORD <br />CAN MEAN <br />DIFFERENT THINGS <br />TO DIFFERENT <br />GROUP MEMBERS <br />because it will give me a better idea <br />of the ways in which flexible work- <br />ing hours might affect employee tar- <br />diness and absenteeism." Explaining <br />the reasons behind your question <br />helps people interpret your behavior <br />correctly and reduces the risk that <br />they'll make incorrect assumptions or <br />inferences. Without an explanation, <br />people might infer that you're con- <br />sidering punitive actions for tardy <br />employees. <br />Disagree openly with group mem- <br />bers. Open disagreement is consis- <br />tent with the core value of valid <br />information. But the composition of <br />a group may make it difficult for <br />some members to disagree. <br />People whose supervisors are also <br />members of their groups may find it <br />difficult to contradict their bosses. <br />Groups also can consist of sub- <br />groups whose members may be <br />reluctant to cross swords. For exam- <br />ple, managers may not want to dis- <br />agree with each other in front of <br />lower -level employees. <br />By observing nonverbal_ avoidance <br />behaviors, it's possible to tell when <br />people are reluctant to disagree. Just <br />remember that such cues are infer- <br />ences that should be tested. <br />Make statements; invite questions <br />and comments. In other words, peo- <br />ple should express their points of <br />view, explain their reasons, and then <br />port, it will learn quickly that mem- ask others to respond and say <br />bers hadn't agreed on the meaning whether they agree or disagree. <br />of consensus. For example, a group member <br />One way to determine whether all might say, "I think department heads <br />group members think a word means should have their own budgets to <br />the same thing is to ask them about make their accountability commensu- <br />the word the first time someone uses rate with their responsibility. But <br />it. For example, someone can say, some of you may not agree. I'd like <br />"You used the word `consensus.' To to hear what each of you thinks, pro <br />me, consensus mearns_.unanirnous or con." <br />agreement. Is that what-= consensus Inviting others to comment <br />means to you ?" When you describe a encourages them to challenge ideas. <br />word's meaning, you should also It also turns discussions from mono - <br />describe what it doesn't mean. logues into dialogues. It may seem <br />Explain the reasons behind state- counterproductive to encourage dis- <br />ments, questions, and actions. This agreement, but group members must <br />rule means that people should tell identify and resolve their disagree - <br />others why they're doing what ments in order to reach a decision to <br />. they're doing —as part of sharing all which all can commit. <br />relevant information and identifying Jointly design ways of testing dis- <br />personal interests. agreements and solutions. Imagine <br />For example, suppose that you that a group is discussing whether <br />want to ask a group how often peo- the organization responds quickly <br />ple are late to work. You might say, enough to customer complaints. <br />"I'm asking for this information Diane believes that customers are <br />Training & Development, August 1994 49 <br />