Browse
Search
Meeting 031496
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 031496
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:56:11 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:37:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dan Teichman: Reference to Joe Pickard's land behind his house. <br />Doesn't want to see houses on 0.4 acre lots behind his house, would <br />rather see a park. Way to create incentive for one vs other is to <br />give Joe opportunity to maximize value for his land. Don't know to <br />do that with modified TDR approach and can't imagine how park land <br />value could offset value he would receive by developing it. Don't <br />know that mechanisms we are discussing (only sending and receiving <br />in this area) are enough, not necessarily wrong, just not enough to <br />overcome monetary drive for property rights in this area. <br />Bob Hall: Reference to Bob Strayhorn's comments about RCS and not <br />always translated into dollars and cents, incentives can be like <br />his comments regarding process, i.e., making it easier to develop. <br />There can be incentives in the planning - process that have a value. <br />Bob Strayhorn: That don't have anything to do with density. <br />Dan Teichman: This group is struggling to make FDO more relevant to <br />us and have more teeth to it. When push comes to shove don' t think <br />the numbers will work in this area. Works great if you have $500 <br />acre land in northern part of county, but doesn't work on Bob's <br />land and like to think it doesn't work on Joe Pickard's property. <br />Bob Hall: Think we need to talk to Joe Pickard. Just like what <br />Curtis envisions for his property is different than what the <br />Strayhorn's want for theirs. If we are going to try to identify <br />tools and incentives to implement plan, helpful to find out what it <br />is (desires of landowners) . TDR approach may be useful for Curtis <br />whereas "faster track" may be more appealing to Bob. <br />Verla Insko: What are some tools /incentives that might be <br />applicable to various colors on maps? <br />Gene Bell: Easy to address for yellow. Reference to RCS suggestion <br />by Bob Strayhorn at subcommittee meeting re streamlined approval <br />process for lots five acres or greater. Short discourse on classes <br />of subdivision, i.e., exempt plat (10.01+ acre lots) = quickest, <br />minor subdivision (five or fewer lots) = administrative approval in <br />Planning Department, and major subdivision (greater than five lots) <br />= at least two reviews by Planning Board and review /approval by <br />County commissioners (lengthy process). <br />Bob Strayhorn: Reference to Bob Nutter subdividing some of his <br />property and paying someone to carry it through the process for <br />him; ended up costing him $1,500 per lot. It's not only the <br />Planning Department involved. You have the Health Department, <br />Department of Transportation, etc. <br />Emily Cameron: Having worked with people, would say it's probably <br />worth paying someone familiar with the process to coordinate the <br />surveyor, Health Department, contractors, DOT, attorneys, etc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.