Browse
Search
Meeting 030496
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 030496
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:55:27 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:37:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION <br />STRATEGY SUBCOMMITTEE <br />At the February 28 meeting of the Planning Group, a set of recommendations from <br />the Implementation Strategies Subcommittee was distributed and discussed (those <br />recommendations are an attachment to the minutes of that meeting and are <br />included in this agenda packet). The Planning Group was unable to resolve some <br />of the recommendations and referred them back to the subcommittee for further <br />deliberations. Elio Soldi summarized these issues on pages 13 and 14 of the draft <br />minutes. The Implementation Strategies Subcommittee convened on March 7 to <br />review these items and makes the following recommendations: <br />Provision of 70% Open Space in a Development <br />At the meeting on the 28th, Meg McKean proposed this as a desirable option for <br />which a developer should receive incentives to pursue. The subcommittee was <br />supportive of the idea and suggested expedited review and approval as an <br />incentive to get a developer to use this option. The subcommittee said they still <br />needed to see the Rural Design Guidelines. <br />Counting 50% of Active Recreation Space in the Lower Intensity Area Toward <br />Open Space <br />The Subcommittee discussed this item at length. General consensus was that 50% <br />of active recreation space should not count toward open space in the lower <br />intensity (yellow) plan area. This would not preclude active recreation uses in the <br />louver intensity area, they just wouldn't be allowed to count toward open space. <br />Active recreation uses would continue to count toward open space at the 50% rate <br />in the intermediate (pumpkin) and higher intensity (rust) plan areas. <br />Expedited Review and Approval <br />The subcommittee was supportive of expedited review as an incentive for certain <br />types of development. A prime example is the provision of 70% open space as <br />mentioned above pending review of the Rural Design Guidelines. Another option <br />mentioned was expedited review for developments that provide lot sizes of five <br />acres and greater (this was a recommendation of the Rural Character Study <br />Committee several years ago). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.